Dems find citizen problems

Tuesday, June 13, 2017|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s opinion area

Citizen suppression can be specified as any attempt to reduce citizen involvement. Obvious methods consist of voter ID, evidence of citizenship, and minimizing poll areas and hours. Skillfully concealed techniques consist of needing membership in a specific political celebration to enact openly funded elections, not restoring the right of all citizens to have a voice in who represents them, revoking the right to vote for a city authorities and not instituting a ballot approach that would increase involvement.

Voter suppression as public policy is abstruse. Yet that’s precisely what Democratic management in the Legislature has actually done.

Presently more than 400,000 signed up citizens (27 percent of active registered voters) are not signed up as Democratic or Republican. As such, they are not enabled to vote in primary elections paid for by their tax dollars. A bill opening primary elections to all voters, remedying this unfairness, was not given a hearing. Asked why, Senate Bulk Leader Aaron Ford responded, “We don’t feel it deserves a hearing. Next question.” 400,000 voters rejected the right to vote in an openly financed election due to the fact that they opted to sign up as nonpartisan, Independent American, Libertarian or Green party members represents citizen suppression.

Prior to this last election, if only one political party fielded two or more candidates for a specific workplace, the leading 2 prospects would take on in the basic election so even members of the opposing party might choose their preferred prospect. Under a change made in 2015 which affected 21 races in 2016, the winner of the closed main sophisticated unopposed. All citizens not signed up to that celebration had no voice. This expense would have brought back the old approach. Voters having their choice eliminated is voter suppression.

The city of Henderson requested a change to its city charter to enable mail tallies for all elections, increasing citizen involvement. The bill received a hearing, but the Democratic chair didn’t bring it to a vote. Not expanding the way individuals can vote increasing participation is citizen suppression.

Last session, the Democratic minority obstructed presidential primaries. This session, in the bulk, they didn’t allow a vote, putting Nevada’s role in nationwide party politics above voter involvement.

“Nevadans concur that we have to have a voting system that secures the fundamental right of every qualified voter– Democrat, Republican, nonpartisan or otherwise. Voting is a right, not an advantage.” (Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson upon Gov. Brian Sandoval’s veto of Initative Petition 1 Automatic Voter Registration)

“We likewise need to protect our heritage. That suggests … making it simpler for our citizens to take part in the democratic process.” (The Democratic Caucus’ Nevada Blueprint)

These 2 statements appear contradictory to the action taken. Intentional or not, voter involvement is curtailed. A different instructions is possible. We manage the future.

Doug Goodman resides in Sparks and is the founder of Nevadans for Election Reform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *