Tag Archives: agenda

What’s missing from Raiders conference agenda as essential as exactly what’s there

Image

Courtesy of MANICA Architecture A take a look at the proposed $1.9 billion domed football stadium for the Oakland Raiders and UNLV football in Las Vegas.

Raiders proposed Las Vegas stadium Release slideshow” Related content The two trickiest contracts left for the Las Vegas Stadium Authority to negotiate before the Raiders break ground later this year do not appear on Thursday’s board conference program. Neither the UNLV joint-use arrangement nor the community advantages contract appear on a prolonged schedule for the board’s very first gathering given that mid-July. The UNLV file warranted a brief status upgrade at that last Stadium Authority board meeting, while public comment on the neighborhood advantages contract extended more than an hour after more than 1,000 task hunters were duped into showing up to the conference trying to find a non-existent job fair. UNLV and the Raiders must agree on how they will share the 65,000-seat stadium as needed by Senate Bill 1, the public financing legislation authorized last fall that authorizes $750 million in tax cash for the$ 1.9 billion stadium. The Sun reported last month that the Raiders desire UNLV to help reduce their dire stadium parking situation by enabling the team to utilize more than 7,000 university parking spaces for video game days and other significant events. The Raiders also looked for control of luxury suite and club seat sales for Rebels football video games. The group wished to package UNLV games with its own, then repay the university for suite sales at the price of

a club seat. After receiving the Raiders initial proposal, UNLV officials responded by employing effective New York-based sports law practice Herrick and among their leading lawyer, Daniel Etna, at an expense of approximately $745 per hour. Negotiations between the Raiders and UNLV

continue, but have not progressed to the point of returning prior to the board. The neighborhood advantages agreement appears further behind schedule. State Sen.Aaron Ford– the state legislative point man on the issue– said earlier this month that he continues to go over the agreement with Raiders authorities, but board chairman Steve Hill does not prepare for

significant movement on that document at the minute. Within the requirements of that arrangement is language mandating the production of a committee to oversee its execution. That committee has actually not yet been formed. Hill stated recently he expects both topics to return for the Sept. 14 meeting. Two self-imposed due dates create pressure on the Raiders, UNLV and the arena authority if that timeline holds. Hill recognized October as the latest point at which the board could approve any of the dozen files required by law.

While that due date likely includes a modicum of versatility, the 31-month stadium building contains little room for hold-ups to be all set for the first Raiders game in August 2020. The board authorized in May the Raiders 30-year lease vfor the stadium and it will get status updates on the individual seat license agreement and another procedural agreement at Thursday’s conference. The second due date appears in Hill’s dedication to board members

earlier this year that he would not ask to vote on any document they did not have a chance to evaluate well prior to it appears on an agenda. That indicates any contract will have to be finished well in advance of the conference

where it gets a vote. The board will hear a stadium status check from Raiders officials at the conference, in addition to a presentation from Bank of America agents on arena financing. Bank of America agreed in February to provide $650 million toward arena construction to the Raiders after local gambling establishment mogul Sheldon Adelson withdrew his

monetary commitment to the project days earlier. Bank authorities regularly decrease requests to talk about the stadium, so Thursday will offer an unusual take a look at their involvement. The meeting starts at 1 p.m. Thursday and can be streamed through the stadium authority site.

GOP issues on Trump and Comey position risk to their agenda

Image

Evan Vucci/ AP President Donald Trump speaks to reporters throughout a conference with Henry Kissinger, previous secretary of state and nationwide security advisor under President Richard Nixon, in the Oval Workplace of the White House, Wednesday, Might 10, 2017, in Washington.

Thursday, May 11, 2017|2 a.m.

WASHINGTON– A number of Republican senators are questioning the timing of President Donald Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey. But even as the issue emerges as a possible diversion from the GOP’s legislative program, many are dismissing Democratic calls for an unique counsel, and their hand-wringing looks not likely to lead to any concrete action.

Senate Bulk Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., moved promptly to turn down Democrats’ demands for a special district attorney to examine Russian meddling in the 2016 election and ties with the Trump campaign. Such a visit “could only serve to impede the existing work being done” by the Senate intelligence committee and the FBI itself, McConnell said.

Democrats argued that an independent, outside questions led by a special district attorney was a needed next action, offered Trump’s choice to oust Comey in the middle of the FBI’s Russia examination. The firing came not long after Comey had requested additional resources for the investigation, inning accordance with U.S. officials, although the Justice Department challenged that.

“All we are looking for is some assurance that the subject of this examination is not able to influence it or, God forbid, quash it,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

However Senate intelligence committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., firmly insisted that his panel has “got the jurisdictional responsibility to examine this. We are going to do that.”

“I think this made our task a little more difficult however it didn’t make it difficult so we’ll continue,” Burr included of the Comey firing. “I’m extremely positive we can get to the bottom of it, but we’ve got to be offered the time and access to interview the right individuals.” Burr said the timing and reasoning for Comey’s firing “doesn’t make sense to me.”

For Republicans who have typically prevented criticizing Trump throughout different controversies, the expressions of issue coming from well over a dozen Senate Republicans were notable. Rank-and-file legislators and committee chairs alike said the timing was doubtful and the administration needs to give an accounting of exactly what happened. Yet Republicans did not appear poised to take any particular action to force the problem.

“While this was eventually a judgment call by the president, I think there are questions about timing that the administration and Justice Department are going to have to respond to in the days ahead,” said Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 3 Senate Republican.

The problem also threatened to consume time Republican politicians would choose to dedicate to their efforts to rescind and change former President Barack Obama’s health law. Rather a controversial fight looms over verifying whomever Trump chooses to change Comey, although it will take only an easy bulk in the 100-member Senate and for that reason no Democratic votes will be needed.

The intelligence committee announced it had invited Comey to appear next week, guaranteeing continued concentrate on the FBI and Russia instead of health care and taxes.

The administration’s stated factor for the firing was that Trump had actually lost self-confidence in Comey, and administration authorities pointed to a letter from Deputy Attorney general of the United States Rod Rosenstein harshly criticizing Comey’s leadership of the Hillary Clinton email investigation. White House officials noted that Democrats themselves had voiced grievances about Comey or called for his ouster, an argument McConnell and some other Republicans echoed.

Democrats, with little option in the minority, cast about for techniques to accentuate their demand for an unique district attorney or keep up pressure on Republicans. They called an unique caucus conference, convened as a group on the Senate floor, and threatened to utilize procedural strategies to slow Senate business to a crawl.

“I think the Democrats are taken part in a partisan fishing exploration,” complained Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.

But others voiced concerns for the administration and the course ahead.

“I think the White House, after multiple discussions with lots of people over the last 12-14 hours, understands that they have actually produced a truly tight spot for themselves,” said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. “And to move beyond this in a manner that provides the American individuals faith, and Republicans and Democrats in your house and Senate faith in future efforts, is going to be a really tough and narrow course for them to follow.”