[not able to retrieve full-text content] Nevada gambling regulators declined a proposed settlement on Thursday with a distressed sports books operator, which admitted to taking unlawful bets and …
Every year, hundreds of books in libraries throughout the nation are challenged for material that some deem questionable or inappropriate. The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Flexibility reported a 17 percent increase in the variety of reported book censorship problems in 2016.
Librarians like Amanda Melilli, head of the Teacher Advancement and Resources Library at UNLV, remain vigilant in the fight versus censorship. In honor of Prohibited Books Week (Sept. 24-30), Melilli goes over the function of libraries in the fight versus censorship, equipping teachers with tools to engage varying perspectives and concepts, and her own favorite “banned books.”
What is Prohibited Books Week and why is it crucial?
Banned Books Week is an event of intellectual freedom; the ability of people to check out and pursue whatever details they need or want. It’s a time to assess the censorship cases of the previous year and raise awareness of the importance of not limiting access to details. A number of us presume that book bannings are a distant memory, but difficulties and the elimination of books from libraries and schools still occur regularly. How common is it today for a library to receive difficulties to books on its shelves?
It’s relatively hard to determine since numerous obstacles go unreported. In 2016, the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom recorded 323 challenges; nevertheless, it is approximated that 82-97 percent of difficulties are never reported.
Additionally, some libraries are more vulnerable to challenges than others. Academic libraries, which deal mostly with adult populations, have a dramatically lower variety of obstacles each year than public or school libraries. When individuals or groups request that books or other materials be removed from library collections or a school’s curriculum, it’s generally due to the fact that they feel that the content is not appropriate for children or young adults. This is evident in the book challenges statistics for 2016 with 49 percent of obstacles happening in town libraries, 30 percent in schools, and 20 percent in school libraries. In addition, there is significant pressure on some librarians to self-censor collections and not collect anything that might be considered “questionable.” In the 2016 School Library Journal Controversial Book Study, nine from 10 school curators reported not purchasing a book for their collection because of potentially questionable subjects– the leading three factors being sexual material, blasphemy, and LGBTQ content. We have to support our teachers so that they can develop diverse and significant collections for everybody without fear of effects.
What function do libraries and librarians play in making sure users maintain access to books some may consider questionable?
Libraries are for everybody! They are safe places for individuals to gain access to information that they may not have the ability to access anywhere else. It is our professional responsibility to make sure our collections fulfill the needs of the communities we serve and not censor our collections based upon the what individuals consider to be proper. This suggests that libraries will have materials that some people will not agree with, but we are here to protect and advocate for the flexibility to pursue info without judgement. This is especially real for kids and young people, whose positions in society as minors significantly prevents their ability to access information. Nobody must be able to decide exactly what books are or are not appropriate for other people to check out; that choice is for each of us to make for ourselves, and libraries are here to support the details requirements of individuals. Exactly what are some of your favorite “banned books”?
There are a lot of! Some of the more typically challenged books that have actually had the most influence on me as a person would be The Things They Brought by Tim O’Brien, Fun House: A Household Tragicomic by Alison Bechdel, Cherished by Toni Morrison, and Their Eyes Were Viewing God by Zora Neale Hurston. Nevertheless, it should be kept in mind that these are some of my all-time favorite books that just so happen to be regularly challenged, and I think lots of other readers out there would also find their preferred books on the most challenged lists. Why is it essential to expose ourselves to different concepts or perspectives that might be included in controversial books?
I think we need to initially be careful of using the term “controversial books” due to the fact that exactly what one person sees as controversial, another person would see as being totally reasonable. The majority of challenged books are being labeled “questionable” only due to the fact that they contain content that some individuals and groups think is not acceptable for other groups, however this does not imply that these titles aren’t developmentally suitable for their target audience.
At our yearly Banned Books Buffet occasion where students get a possibility to engage with challenged books, the most typical reaction is amazement that a few of their favorite books have actually been challenged. We do a great deal of research study on private books to figure out why somebody found them offensive. Although a book may be challenged, it does not mean that its content is widely thought about controversial. Accessing materials with different ideas and viewpoints is a vital part in assisting us grow as people. Books allow us to experience the world and varied perspectives regardless of the restrictions of our everyday lives. They help us construct our identities and offer us a safe place to engage with the world.
In kids’s literature, there’s an example that there are mirror books and window books. Mirror books offer us even more viewpoints on ourselves and supply validation as people. Window books enable us to look into the lives of individuals who are different from ourselves and assist us establish empathy for others. The problem with limiting access to particular books is that it is all at once rejecting someone their mirror and others their window; one book can indicate many different things to different individuals. As head of the Teacher Advancement & & Resources Library, you help current and future teachers get ready for their time in the class. How does the library prepare educators to deal with censorship?
The main way that we help is by establishing information literacy skills in our current and future teachers. Finding impactful kids’s and young adult materials to fit the requirements of private PreK-12 trainees and class is a complex process that requires educators to be skilled researchers. They need to not just identify particular books from the thousands of brand-new titles being released each year but also evaluate them for appropriateness and effectiveness for their students. This consists of having the ability to articulate and justify the reasoning behind their options.
It’s tempting to believe that there is a short list of books that will work for every trainee and every class, however that’s simply not the case. Each group of trainees will be different and react to individual books in a different way. Helping our educators to be thoughtful, reflective researchers will better place them to defend their classroom material options.
We also work vigilantly to provide education on censorship and the value of battling against it so that our educators are much better informed on the intricacy of censorship in schools. This is seen through events like the Banned Books Buffet and our constant emphasis on the importance of varied children’s and young adult literature being integrated into the PreK-12 curriculum. Although Banned Books Week is simply one week, we talk with our teachers year round on censorship concerns through our library direction sessions or presentations at events like the Gayle A. Zeiter Kid’s and Young Adult Literature Conference. We’re here to support Las Vegas educators, to assist them find the info and resources that they require, so that they can offer the very best support and instructional experiences to their own students.
[not able to recover full-text material] The Friday-Saturday series of literary occasions showcased informing performances from national and local writers.
Chris Pizzello/ Invision/ AP
Sunday, Sept. 20, 2015|12:17 p.m.
The Emmy Awards, tv’s yearly celebration of itself, are always a huge night. However this Sunday’s event might end up supersized.
Performers and programs could be setting records and making breakthroughs at the 67th prime-time Emmys.
Viola Davis of “Ways to Get Away with Murder” or Taraji P. Henson of “Empire” have an opportunity to end up being the very first black lady to win as finest drama series starlet.
“I got ta win! I got ta win for history!” an exuberant Henson stated when asked about the possibility last May.
Gender-identity problems brought to the fore by Caitlyn Jenner and others likely will be a notable part of the ceremony airing survive Fox with host Andy Samberg.
“Transparent” star Jeffrey Tambor, thought about a front-runner for the best comedy star prize, would make the first Emmy for representation of a transgender character.
Bradley Whitford got a guest-actor prize for his cross-dressing “Transparent” character at the innovative arts Emmys last weekend.
The freshman Amazon series is a competitor for best comedy honors, and a victory would make it the first online program to record leading series honors.
Others vying for that crown are the Netflix series “Residence of Cards” and “Orange is the New Black.” They became competing siblings when the TV academy moved “Orange” from the comedy to drama classification.
“Video game of Thrones,” this year’s top nominee overall, could make a significant revealing with a best drama victory: It would end up being the second fantasy or sci-fi program to get the award, following “Lost” in 2005.
Its competition evens the last season of “Mad Men,” positioned to set a record as the most honored drama series ever with a fifth award. The cast hasn’t fared as well, never winning despite repeated nods.
Making a last stand are star Jon Hamm, whose representation of distressed ad man Don Draper has actually been nominated for each of the drama’s eight seasons, along with best actress nominee Elisabeth Moss and supporting starlet contender Christina Hendricks.
When it comes to ratings, Fox is relying on a bit more than the audience’s love of TELEVISION as the tourist attraction. “Fox NFL Sunday” is broadcasting from the red carpet and the Philadelphia Eagles-Dallas Cowboys telecast precedes the awards.
Having football as the lead-in to 2013’s Emmys made the event a winner for CBS with 17.8 million audiences, the greatest audience in 8 years. In 2014’s 15.6 million viewers was the second-highest overall for the duration.
Merle Haggard once asked Kix Brooks why The Last Rodeo had to be the last. “We had him out for the last two weeks of our tour, which was a big honor for us,” Brooks said last week throughout a round-table media session at Caesars Palace. “We were resting on his bus in Woodstock in New York, watching out at this sold-out crowd, and he stated, ‘Damn, Kix, exactly what are you doing?’ I said, ‘What do you suggest?’ And he said, ‘Take a look at all those people. Why would you want to leave this?'”
This remained in 2010, on the last leg of exactly what was to be the last tour headlined by Brooks & & Dunn, a duo that debuted in 1990 and had delighted in more success than they ‘d ever imagined. Which resulted in Brooks’ answer to Haggard’s questions.
“I stated, ‘Damn, Merle. I loved Pancho & & Lefty,” Brooks said, referring to the 1983 album recorded by Haggard and Willie Nelson. “You and Willie did one freakin’ album and stop! Ronnie and I made it Twenty Years! Are you kidding me?”
Today, Brooks & & Dunn are refrained. They are now two-thirds of a trio headlining the Colosseum, in addition to nation legend Reba McEntire. The table-setting title of this production, Reba and Brooks & & Dunn: Together in Vegas makes the point clear: These are stars of equivalent billing sharing a phase on the Strip. The triune launched its residency on June 17, with shows continuing this month, in early July once more in mid-December.
It’s a reintroduction to Las Vegas for all 3 super stars. Reba debuted in the city in the mid-1980s, opening for Roy Clarke at Caesars Palace’s Circus Maximus. Brooks & & Dunn also played that space, and in 2006 all 3 played the Las Vegas Hilton, though the dates staggered, with Reba playing spring and summer gigs that year and Brooks & & Dunn carrying out in December.
As the return to Vegas has already suggested, the Reba and Brooks & & Dunn residency is an exercise in entertainment, education and lighting. From the opening weekend, we found:
The trio are still impressed at having their images grace marquees ignoring the Strip. “We were hanging our heads out the window, taking photos of the sign outside,” Ronnie Dunn stated. “We were hoping we ‘d strike a red light so we might fire off enough shots.”
The setlist went through multiple variations before landing on the 30 songs played at the Colosseum. The secret was to ask, “Which ones do I want to sing among my own songs?” McEntire discussed. “I picked out my favorites, and they picked out their favorites, and we put them together.” Brooks included, “Ronnie and I had actually assembled an excellent hour and a half or more of simply great songs we might agree on, on our own, and cut that in half. So we’re playing a great deal of collections, mashing up a few of those songs, which was something we truly had not done before.”
Hence, the list draws a high quality of hits from both acts, like “Play Something Nation,” “Boot Scootin’ Boogie,” “Why Have not I Heard From You?” “The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia,” “You Lie,” “You’re Gon na Miss Me When I’m Gone,” “Ain’t Absolutely nothing ‘Bout You” and “Only in America.”
Brooks & & Dunn get on simply great. Many music observers, Elton John amongst them, have actually questioned if these people simply don’t mix well (Elton has joked onstage at the Colosseum that Reba was enhanced the act because the other 2 don’t speak with each other). But that does not appear to be the case. “There’s no rift,” Brooks stated. “We simply stopped performing since there had not been anything left for us to achieve.” Echoed Dunn, “We figured we ‘d done it all.”
Reba is mostly liable for the early success of Brooks & & Dunn, and also for this residency. The three visited together in 1993-94 and again in 1997-98. “She was the very first person who really took us on trip,” Brooks stated. “We were working for her, however there wasn’t any, ‘Do not look me in the eye,” stuff going on.” At which point Dunn stepped in and stated, “We did need to break through the star curve, the vanity thing …” And Reba fired back with, “I am gon na beat the tar from you! He teems with it!”
Reba was the very first star to invite the duo to heading a significant U.S. trip, was the first to welcome them on a personal jet and was the first to offer a raise– unsolicited– during that trip. “She pertained to our dressing room and said, ‘We believe you’re fixin’ to have a real big profession and we want to be buddies.”
As for the go back to Vegas, Dunn said, “I don’t believe we ‘d be performing together if it just weren’t for this residency, and if it just weren’t for Reba.”
Reba, Brooks & & Dunn Next shows June 26 & & 27, July 1, 3 & 4; 7:30 p.m.; $60-$205. Colosseum, 866-227-5938.