Tag Archives: budget

CCSD budget plan reductions lead to loss of 563 school positions

LAS VEGAS (FOX5) –

The Clark County School District revealed a budget plan reduction of about $68 million for the next year, suggesting 563 position will be lost through the schools.

The positions consist of 400 licensed positions, 104 assistance staff positions and 59.5 administrative positions, inning accordance with a press release.

“CCSD still has practically 800 open teaching positions, and we encourage teachers who are considering transferring to Clark County or others thinking about getting in the mentor profession to join our team,” Chief Human Being Resources Officer Andre Long stated. “We look forward to inviting new instructors to continue the recent momentum we have actually seen in increasing trainee accomplishment.”

About $17.6 million was minimized by high schools, $10.7 million in middle schools and $18.8 million through grade schools across Clark County.

The district stated human resources will work to position affected employees in employment opportunities that they receive.

CCEA executive director John Vellardita said while 560 positions were gotten rid of, nobody is losing their job.

“Folks were either given an opportunity to take a different position or if it was a position that was moneyed and not filled, it just got removed off the books,” he stated.

That’s the positive. However moms and dads stated they were seeing more negatives.

“The school district is producing this mess, but they are very far from the ones who have to handle the implications of it,” parent Sara Rose stated.

Rose is part of the School Organizational Team at her boy’s middle school. She said she works with other moms and dads, instructors and school leaders to set the budget plan. At her child’s school, Knudson Middle, they were required to cut more than $190,000.

“All these kids, (and) us moms and dads are going to go into next year feeling like the vice grip tightened,” she stated. “And there’s actually nothing we can do about it.”

The cuts meant removing its robotics program, the whole factor Rose’s son enrolled, and cutting an administrative position. Rose said parents are currently offering in the front workplace since they’re so short-staffed.

“It’s just unreasonable because the principal and the instructors are the ones who absorb the impact and they’re already spent,” Rose stated. Schools that saw the greatest cuts are Coronado, Rancho and Clark High Schools. The least cuts are at Goodsprings, Reid and Lundy Elementary Schools.

“This is not a great message to send out nationally or within the state, ‘Come work at Clark County, at a time when it looks like Clark County School District is removing positions,'” Vellardita stated.

Vellardita said they were currently dealing with a teacher shortage.

He said the union will be watching on classroom size and teacher spirits next year.

In addition to job cuts, CCSD validated some schools are getting rid of programs that might include foreign language, after-school programs, checking out or mathematics intervention.

Lots of moms and dads said they are not willing to sacrifice any longer.

“I suggest it’s just aggravating and if we have to end up doing this another year, I imply we may have no other choice but to move,” Rose said.

When CCSD released the numbers it included a statement, reading in part, “This is an unfortunate scenario due to increasing staff member costs and other expenses that are outmatching development in school funding. Still, CCSD has been proud of recent academic accomplishments got in spite of spending plan decreases.”

CCSD included it still has almost 800 openings in the class.

Copyright 2018 KVVU (KVVU Broadcasting Corporation). All rights reserved.

Budget proposition’s prescription to recover national forests is a poison tablet

Monday, Feb. 26, 2018|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s opinion section

Taking a look at one part of President Donald Trump’s budget plan, you may believe his administration is riding to the rescue of the National Park Service.

However a broader view of the general budget reveals something really different. The administration’s prepare for our national forests threaten to tear them to pieces.

While Trump suggests investing $18.7 billion to repair a massive upkeep backlog, which would look like a smart idea, the issue is that all but $257 million of that funding would come from private markets that would be admitted to the parks to utilize for commercial functions– primarily oil and gas companies. More specifically, the financing would be derived from the government collecting a percentage of energy leasing invoices.

Even worse yet, the Department of Interior would be offered the prerogative to offer any public lands that “show an increase in value from the sale.” That means Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and his personnel might provide acreage at their discretion if they think the federal government could make a buck off of it.

Rollbacks of policies on oil and gas extraction include another layer of concern to the plan.

This is a red alert circumstance.

It brings to mind horrible pictures of Trump and Zinke selling sliced-and-diced parts of the parks and public lands for fracking and oil drilling operations, turning peaceful natural locations into noisy and unclean beehives of extraction work and truck traffic.

It merely can not be permitted to take place. Nevada’s congressional delegates need to fight it, and need to understand that citizens will hold them responsible if they permit the Trump administration to carry out its assault on our public lands.

This especially applies to Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev. As he increasingly sucks up to the president in hopes of winning his main contest over Trump drone Danny Tarkanian, Heller must know that Nevadans anticipate him to fix a limit and protect our lands, political effects be damned.

Another essential reason to oppose Trump and Zinke on the concern is that the budget requires huge cutbacks in staffing– 1,835 National Parks Service staff members, 1,209 from the U.S. Geological Survey, 559 from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and 330 from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

That’s a heavy human cost. And when it comes to the parks staff members, you’ll feel their loss if you go to a park. Visitation is at its greatest level ever, so staffing cutbacks would imply less people offering services to ever-expanding crowds.

If that’s insufficient, a news product released recently about Zinke and the Trump administration provided Americans more reason to question their motives. The story, published by Mother Jones publication, said 2 U.S. Geological Study employees had actually resigned in protest of a demand by the administration for unpublished data from a study of oil and gas deposits in Alaska, a break from longstanding principles practices.

The story was uncomfortable due to the fact that the report contains economic information that would be important for inside trading– it literally has the potential to move markets. Because of that, USGS standards require the information not to be shown anybody, consisting of members of Congress and other federal and state officials, prior to it’s released to the general public.

Interior administrators claimed they had legal authority to see the information, and there’s been no proof that they utilized it for improper purposes. But it’s a curious scenario that bears enjoying.

When it comes to Trump’s spending plan, it’s worth pointing out that it’s simply a proposal to Congress. The budget plan already has been extensively mocked, considered that it would add $7 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years if embraced, so it’s unlikely that Congress will pass it.

However it does provide a look at how the administration is thinking of the parks system, and more significantly exactly what Trump’s special-interest controllers are requiring from him.

Also, legislators have the choice of adopting parts of it, so there’s need to be concerned for the parks and public lands.

The parks service needs assistance, no doubt. It’s facing an $11.6 billion stockpile of upkeep on its roadways, visitor facilities and other infrastructure.

But the Trump plan is no other way to set about making the fixes.

It’s reminiscent of a quote attributed to a U.S. military officer about the Vietnam War fight in the provincial capital of Ben Tre: “It became essential to ruin the town to wait.”

Trump urges Home GOP to move quickly on budget, tax cuts

Image

J. Scott Applewhite/ AP FILE In this Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2017, file photo, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., pays attention to remarks throughout a news conference at the Capitol in Washington. McConnell stated Sunday, Oct. 22, he wants to bring bipartisan healthcare legislation to the floor if President Donald Trump explains he supports it.

Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017|3:55 p.m.

WASHINGTON, D.C.– President Donald Trump urged House Republicans to move quickly on passing a budget bill throughout a teleconference Sunday, clearing the method for what he referred to as a historic push for tax cuts.

Trump and Vice President Mike Pence both signed up with the House GOP employ which Trump gotten in touch with members to adopt the budget plan gone by the Senate this week, so that they can carry on to passing his tax reform strategy.

Trump informed the members they were on the verge of doing something historic, according to one Republican authorities on the call, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to go over publicly exactly what was intended as a private upgrade for members.

Another GOP aide acquainted with the discussion said that Trump informed the members once again and again that the celebration would have a high rate to pay in next year’s midterm elections if they failed to pass his plan, which would slash the corporate tax rate to 20 percent and double the basic reduction utilized by many average Americans. The president also stated several times that, beyond the looming elections, his plan was the ideal thing to do for nation, the person stated.

The Senate recently passed a budget that consists of guidelines that will permit Republicans to get tax legislation through the Senate without Democratic votes and without worry of a Democratic filibuster.

Republican politicians are desperate to rack up a legal win after a series of awkward failures that have come in spite of the truth that the party manages both chambers of Congress and the White Home.

On the call, Home Speaker Paul Ryan told members he intended to pass a modified Senate spending plan costs today to increase the modifications that tax reform can be enacted by the end of the year.

Trump will also work to rally support for the plan on the Hill Tuesday at a lunch with Senate Republicans.

Congress also continues to battle with the health care system.

Senate Bulk Leader Mitch McConnell stated Sunday he’s willing to bring bipartisan healthcare legislation to the flooring– if Trump makes clear he supports it. A proposition by two senators – Republican Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Democrat Patty Murray of Washington – would extend for 2 years federal insurance payments that Trump has blocked. However Trump has actually offered blended signals, alternately applauding and condemning the effort – confusing Democrats and Republicans alike.

Asked whether he would bring the costs to the floor, McConnell stated on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he was waiting “to speak with President Trump what kind of health care bill he might sign.”

“If there’s a requirement for some kind of interim action here to stabilize the marketplace, we need a bill the president will in fact sign. And I’m not certain yet what the president is searching for here, however I will enjoy to bring an expense to the flooring if I understand President Trump would sign it,” the Republican politician said. He added of Trump: “I think he hasn’t made a final decision.”

The strategy unveiled last week likely has 60 votes in the Senate, mainly from Democrats, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Sunday urged McConnell to bring it to the flooring “instantly, today.”

“This is a great compromise,” Schumer stated on NBC’s “Satisfy journalism.” He forecasted it would pass “by a large number of votes” which the president would ultimately sign it to prevent the blame for rising insurance premiums.

“If Republicans believe that if premiums increase they’re going to prevent the blame, if Senator McConnell believes that, he’s wrong,” Schumer stated.

Trump at first recommended he supported the short-lived fix as he continues to hold out hope for the passage of legislation that would repeal and replace former President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, which Republicans have repeatedly cannot accomplish. However White House authorities stated later that Trump would only sign an interim bill that also raises the tax charges that Obama’s health care law imposes on people who do not buy coverage and companies who do not provide plans to staff members. The White Home also wants arrangements making it simpler for individuals to purchase low-premium policies with less protection. Top Senate Democrats decline those needs.

White House budget director Mick Mulvaney, who was also found at Trump’s Virginia golf course Sunday, stated on CBS’ “Face the Country” that Trump does not want to back a strategy “without also getting something for folks who are being injured.”

“And I believe the criticisms you’ve heard today are like, ‘Look, I’m all right with doing an offer.’ This is the president now. ‘However I’m not getting enough for the folks who are getting hurt. So give me more by method of associated health plans. Provide me more of the important things that we understand” we can do for folks back home to actually assist them,'” Mulvaney stated.

“I think there’s actually a pretty good opportunity to get an offer,” he included. “It’s just Murray-Alexander in its current form most likely isn’t really far enough yet.”

McConnell, in his interviews, also but pressed back against former White Home chief strategist Steve Bannon’s efforts to recruit prospects to challenge Republican incumbents who support McConnell’s leadership, arguing that exactly what Republicans need is candidates who can win.

“Look, this is not about personalities. This is about achievement. And in order to make policy, you have to really win the election,” he said on Fox News. “And some of these folks that you have actually been quoting, as I stated are professionals on nominating individuals who lose.”

AP Congressional Correspondent Erica Werner contributed to this report.

Trump'' s budget plan chief states cash for border wall a must

Image

Andrew Harnik/ AP In this March 16, 2017, file photo, White House spending plan director Mick Mulvaney speaks at the White House, in Washington. Mulvaney states that Democratic arbitrators on a huge costs expense have to agree to moneying top concerns of President Donald Trump, such as a down payment on a border wall and hiring of extra immigration representatives.

Friday, April 21, 2017|2 a.m.

WASHINGTON– Loan for the wall President Donald Trump wishes to develop along the United States border with Mexico must belong to the massive spending expense Congress is preparing, the White Home budget plan director says.

Extra financing also needs to be included to work with more migration representatives, Mick Mulvaney informed The Associated Press in an interview in which he laid out the leading priorities of the president.

Legislators wish to unveil the catchall costs expense next week. Democratic negotiators are most likely to withstand offering the down payment that Mulvaney states Trump wants for building of the wall, however the previous GOP congressman from South Carolina adds that “elections have repercussions.”

Mulvaney likewise stated the administration is open, though undecided, about a crucial Democratic need that the measure spend for cost-sharing payments to insurance provider that assist low-income people pay for health policies under the Affordable Care Act.

The $1 trillion-plus legislation is leftover business from in 2015’s election-season gridlock and would cover the operating expense of every Cabinet department except for Veterans Affairs.

Talks on the procedure have actually hit a rough spot as a deadline to prevent a government shutdown looms late next week. Trump’s presidency is approaching the symbolic 100-day mark, but his GOP allies in Congress have been tempering expectations that the president would become a huge winner.

Democratic votes are likely to be needed to pass whatever costs emerges from the talks, and Senate Democrats might bottle it up totally if they challenge arrangements that they consider to be “toxin tablets”– such as the cash for the wall. Trump campaigned for president on the promise of developing the wall and sticking Mexico with the tab.

GOP leaders on Capitol Hill aspire to prevent a shutdown, and the sluggish pace may make it needed to enact another momentary spending bill to prevent a shutdown next weekend. Mulvaney’s tough line could foreshadow a protracted impasse and increases the possibilities of a government shutdown.

“A shutdown is never ever a desired end and neither is it a technique,” Mulvaney said.

Democrats are confident that Republicans, controlling both House and Senate, would bear the blame for any shutdown, even as Democrats wield power in the talks.

“We have the leverage and they have the direct exposure,” Home Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., informed fellow Democrats on a Thursday teleconference, according to a senior Democratic assistant.

Mulvaney said the White House delivered a deal to mediators Wednesday night, with financing for the border wall a top demand. Other products on the White Home top priority list, Mulvaney stated, are a $30 billion ask for a money infusion for the military and a questionable provision to give the administration higher latitude to reject particular federal grants to “sanctuary cities” that refuse to comply with immigration enforcement by federal authorities.

“We want wall financing. We want (immigration) representatives. Those are our top priorities,” Mulvaney said. “We know there are a great deal of individuals on the Hill, particularly in the Democratic Celebration, who don’t like the wall, but they lost the election. And the president should, I think, at least have the chance to money one of his highest concerns in the first funding costs under his administration.”

He said the wall is “something that’s a remarkable concern for us and that clearly was a critical problem in the 2016 governmental race.” In spite of Trump’s guarantee, the expense of a border wall, anticipated to go beyond $20 billion, would likely be borne by taxpayers. And some Republicans are opposed to the wall too, instead preferring to invest more on innovations such as sensing units and drone aircraft to boost border security.

Democrats have actually taken a tough line versus any loan for the border wall and firmly insist that the measure include the “Obamacare” payments to insurer.

At problem are cost-sharing payments that are an essential subsidy under the healthcare law to assist low-income individuals enrolled through the law’s insurance marketplaces with their out-of-pocket costs. Trump has actually threatened to keep the payments as a means to require Democrats to work out on health care legislation.

The cost-sharing payments are the topic of a lawsuit by Home Republicans, and Trump threatened in an interview with The Wall Street Journal recently to drop the payments, which specialists warn would significantly interfere with Obamacare’s markets.

Mulvaney said the White House isn’t really passionate about Democratic needs on the Obamacare payments however is open to them as part of a broader agreement.

“The president has been priced estimate several times and stated he’s inclined not to make them and I cannot tell you that I have an interest in discouraging him from that position,” Mulvaney said. “That being stated, if it’s important enough to the Democrats, we ‘d be happy to talk to them about including that in sort of some type of compromise.”

Added Mulvaney: “If Democrats are interested and serious about compromise and settlement, the ball remains in their court.”

“Everything had been moving efficiently until the administration relocated with a heavy hand,” countered Matt House, a representative for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. “Not only are Democrats opposed to the wall, there is significant Republican opposition also.”

Heller decries Trump'' s Yucca, budget plan strategies as '' anti-Nevada ' in address to Legislature

Image

Andy Barron/ Reno Gazette Journal through AP

Sen. Dean Heller addresses a question during a city center at the Reno Triggers Convention Center in Reno, April 17, 2107. Heller co-hosted the two-hour occasion with Rep. Mark Amodei, another Nevada Republican politician.

Monday, April 17, 2017|8:30 p.m.

From Yucca Mountain to Syria, Nevada’s Republican politician Sen. Dean Heller spoke with state legislators Monday about his blended stances on actions coming out of the Trump administration.

Heller signed up with a number of lawmakers who have actually spoken against attempts to revive the Yucca Mountain task in speeches before Assembly and Senate members so far this session, while saying he supported President Donald Trump’s actions following a chemical attack in Syria.

“Not just is the use of chemical weapons inhumane, it’s a blatant offense of international law,” Heller stated. “I’m helpful of the Trump administration’s action. It sent out a clear message of America’s intolerance for the murder of innocent civilians.”

He stated the military strike was supported by both Democrats and Republicans.

The senator provided his speech after a Reno town hall with Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., an event that the Associated Press reported was sometimes combative. Protesters also gathered outside the Legislature in Carson City before Heller’s address to legislators.

Lots of used pink in assistance of Planned Parenthood. Heller just recently voted to permit states to decide whether to money the company.

Trump’s proposed budget includes a request for funds to revive efforts to save the nation’s hazardous waste at Yucca Mountain while recommending cuts to public lands programs. Heller stated this move paired with recommended cuts to public lands programs make the president’s budget “anti-Nevada.”

“Let me be clear: Yucca Mountain is dead,” he stated, with a nod to former Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and his opposition to the job. “Nevada will not be our nation’s hazardous waste dump.”

Heller appeared to satirize some current Republican snafus. He drew a laugh from legislators when he said the town hall that morning went efficiently, likewise saying that the president tweeted the occasion was “bigly,” and Press Secretary Sean Spicer stated in an interview that it was the largest city center crowd ever.

Heller said he’s confident that the president will deal with Congress and set out his method for the American people.

“Despite media headlines highlighting divisions in Congress, I discover that more unites us than divides us,” he stated.

Veterans services were a few of the examples of bipartisan legal efforts that Heller pointed to from the past year. He stated he’s dealing with a Democrat to press legislation that, in part, would improve access to gender-specific take care of females who have actually served in the militaries.

He stated there are still spaces in providing prompt care for veterans.

“There is an across the country scarcity of doctors and nurses, and Nevada is facing the worst of it,” Heller said. “So I’m working to develop rewards for doctors to come work at our VA hospitals, specifically in Nevada’s more rural areas.”

On health care, Heller stated the system is broken and the current law has resulted in higher premiums for some.

Heller said coverage ought to be protected for people guaranteed under the present law, including those who got benefits through Medicaid growth. Heller was amongst the Republicans in Congress who did not support the GOP’s plan to rescind and change Obamacare.

“It didn’t work for Nevada, and so it didn’t work for me,” Heller said.

Heller stated a five-year highway bill approved by Congress helps states pursue high-priority jobs, such as the Interstate 11 proposal. That effort would connect Phoenix to Las Vegas to Reno, and Heller stated it would boost tasks and the economy.

The Lake Tahoe Restoration Act was reauthorized last year, and Heller stated he has invested 8 years supporting the step to secure Northern Nevada’s largest tourist draw.

Heller also pointed to his efforts to support policies that would expand renewable resource, and stated the nation’s systems on taxes and migration require reform.

“Congress has actually made substantial progress over the past two years, but we have a great deal of work ahead of us,” Heller stated.

CCSD asks public to assist budget plan $4 billion to improve schools


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) –

Clark County School District authorities are figuring out ways to make use of $4 billion they will be getting after the Nevada Legislature passed a renewed bond authority.

The district’s primary financial officer, Jim McIntosh, stated it’s been 5 years given that the district has built a brand-new school. All construction was halted after county voter’s overruled a 2012 effort to access bonds.

District authorities stated the $4 billion will just cover half of exactly what’s required for new schools, renovation and modernization. That’s why they have set up a public online forum over the next two weeks in every trustee’s district.

The neighborhood will be able to voice whether the funds need to be distributed to new schools, changing schools, repairing heating and cooling systems or upgrading innovation.

Half a billion has actually currently been set aside for 12 brand-new schools and two replacement schools in the planning stages, but McIntosh said those won’t even start to resolve the record number of students the district now has.

“Twelve brand-new schools is not going to address our capacity concern across the Valley, and so we are also taking a look at putting additions on schools. We are also taking a look at improving some of our older schools, entering and replacing A/C systems, plumbing systems, electrical systems,” McIntosh said. “We’re also taking a look at classroom equity, which is bringing our older schools as much as the technical standards of the newer schools we’re constructing today.”

The district has up until September 20 to collect data and input from the community. Leaders will certainly provide a few 10-year strategies to the Board of Trustees to select from on September 24. To provide your input, click right here.

Copyright 2005 KVVU (KVVU Broadcasting Corporation) All rights reserved.

Budget deficiency drives Clark County School District class-size boost

The Clark County School District will certainly enhance class sizes in grades 4 and above as it attempts to reduce an approximated $52 million shortfall in a $2.3 billion budget plan for the 2015-16 school year that trustees approved Wednesday.

District officials don’t anticipate a lot more money to flow from the state budget, which legislators have until June 1 to finalize. However a forecasted $7 per pupil decrease in state financing became an increase of $34 per pupil after lawmakers finished dispute on their education concerns over the weekend.

That will offer an extra $13 million for district coffers, Chief Financial Officer Jim McIntosh stated.

“It’s the best we understand at the moment,” McIntosh said of the quantity he anticipates in per-pupil funding. “But you never ever understand exactly what’s going to happen in the Legislature.”

Pending any surprises in Carson City, district authorities will start sculpting $52 million from the 2015-16 budget with strategies to enhance secondary class sizes by 0.5 students. The present student/teacher ratio is 32-to-1 in fourth and fifth grades; 34-to-1 in intermediate school; and 33.5-to-1 in high school.

That savings, approximated at $9 million, represents 118 teaching positions that the district no longer needs to fill.

“Those are the only cuts that we will certainly be making at this time to schools,” Superintendent Pat Skorkowsky said. “There will certainly be no other cuts that we will certainly recommend in the changed final spending plan that will have any effect to our schools.”

Skorkowsky prepares to direct management departments to cut their budget plans by 1 percent and quickly will certainly announce other “nonschool-based cuts” to fulfill the $52 million decrease target.

The district’s $2.3 billion budget, which works July 1, supports the addition of about 5,000 brand-new students, a 1.5 percent boost in registration from this academic year. Forecasted registration should reach almost 323,000 students next year, though the district won’t have a last count up until October.

About $1.34 billion, or 85 percent of the entire budget plan, will money salaries and advantages for the district’s more than 26,500 workers.

That consists of arranged raise and a 2.25 percent increase in contributions to the Public Employee Retirement System of Nevada.

Overall salary costs will rise by $17.5 million next year.

The continuing to be 15 percent of the budget supports nonsalary expenditures, such as energies, books and materials and fuel and car maintenance.

The district has to hire 2,600 instructors to fill existing and expected jobs. The 2015-16 spending plan allocates $29.8 million for 374 new instructor positions, 84 new support personnel workers and training supplies– all meant to manage the projected increase in student enrollment.

The district also will certainly get ready for ongoing growth in its unique education population, with an extra $12.3 million reserved to work with 149 brand-new instructors and 75 new support personnel employees who can offer those services.

Other top priorities include the expansion of 7 magnet schools and the addition of five “select” schools– at a cost of $8.5 million, including the brand-new bus motorists and fuel needed to carry students to those schools.

Select schools provide profession and technical education programs, advanced positioning courses and other specialized academic programs.

“Magnet schools are truly one of the intense areas here in Clark County,” McIntosh said. “So to be able to broaden them was exciting for us and the board, and it’s an actually essential initiative for the superintendent that type of gets lost in the discussion of cuts).”

The budget plan likewise represents a projected increase in real estate tax collections of $20 million, or 5 percent more than last year. Prior to the recession, the district might bank $600 million in real estate tax collections each year, McIntosh said. Now, it hovers around $400 million.

Although the School Board unanimously accepted the budget, some trustees expressed issues about the district’s dedication to English-language learners.

“I do not think this budget reflects our top priorities in regards to English-language acquisition,” District F Trustee Carolyn Edwards stated. “At some time, I want to have a discussion about that.”

Contact Neal Morton at [email protected]!.?.! or 702-383-0279. Discover him on Twitter: @nealtmorton.