Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2018|2 a.m.
View more of the Sun’s viewpoint area
Broadening health protection, reforming our democracy, bring back upward mobility with well-paying tasks, curbing weapon violence and relocating to fix our immigration system.
Oh, yes, and protecting our constitutional republic from President Donald Trump while rooting out corruption.
This ought to be the program of Democrats in your house of Representatives. Already, some experts are cautioning that the brand-new bulk will “overreach.” However overreach is not the problem for a celebration that controls only one chamber of Congress.
The larger danger is underachievement. Democrats will waste their triumph– their largest gain in Home seats given that 1974– if they fail to use their power to show what the alternative to Trumpism appears like.
Yes, a lot of their ideas will pass away in the Senate. But Republican politicians because progressively unrepresentative body ought to be made to pay a high cost for warding off development. If the cost proves high enough, some advantages may occur before 2020.
This is not about Democrats going “hard left,” an expression we’ll hear a lot on Fox News. What unites the strong progressives and their less-overtly ideological brethren who won much of last week’s contests is a desire to show that government, utilized smartly, can make life much better for the vast majority.
Finding commonalities throughout the center-left, among the political imperatives of the brand-new bulk, does not mean least-common-denominator politics. It implies agreeing on steps in the right direction: more people with health care, greater incomes and household leave; more with an unimpeded right to vote; more feeling more secure from violence; more with confidence that our system is not a cesspool.
Democrats are also being counseled versus becoming the all-investigations-all-the-time celebration. But these admonitions presume the party’s leaders are, well, idiots. It won’t be tough to utilize the regular course of House company to hold hearings that expose both the policy failures of the Trump presidency and the corruption he has fostered. Committee chairs ought to thoroughly time the queries so that scandals do not press each other aside and therefore fail to penetrate the public consciousness.
There should be a heavy focus on how Trump has betrayed his core assures– to stand up for forgotten Americans to whom he has actually provided nothing but despiteful demagoguery, most just recently his evanescent interest in “caravans;” and to drain pipes a swamp he remains in truth polluting a lot more.
All this would be much easier if the rule of law did not face such an alarming hazard from Trump himself. His almost certainly unlawful consultation of the swampy Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general represents just such a peril. Given the Senate’s sycophancy towards Trump, it falls to the House, the media and lower-court judges to safeguard us from autocracy. (We’ll discover if the Supreme Court can live up to its constitutional obligations.)
It is dangerously incorrect to argue that Democrats need to select in between legislating and holding Trump responsible. History gives them no option but to do all they can to stop Trump from trashing unique counsel Robert Mueller’s inquiry, ruining evidence and politicizing law enforcement. If the president says the price of a good infrastructure costs is Democratic submission to law breaking, let Trump pay the cost of breaking one of his signature pledges. It’s in his interest to develop those roads and bridges.
Remembering what you campaigned on is constantly a good concept. Democrats have actually promised fast action on protecting the insurance coverage of Americans with pre-existing health conditions and enacting a comprehensive democracy reform bundle with strong provisions on voting rights, project financing reform, gerrymandering and ending the various kinds of Trump-era corruption.
The next step would be expansions of health coverage through a public choice or a Medicare buy-in constant with the views of new members throughout the spectrum.
Also a top priority: strong measures versus gun violence. The mass killings continue unabated. Inaction would be immoral. It would likewise break the commitments so many of the recently chosen made.
For the longer term, Democrats need to listen to previous Farming Secretary Tom Vilsack and writers Alec MacGillis and Michael Tomasky on the imperative of creating a new agenda for rural, small-town and small-city America. Confining opportunity to large metropolitan areas would deepen national departments and, by the method, foster long-term Republican control of the Senate.
Over the past century, Democrats held your house without managing the Senate for just 6 years, in between 1981 and 1987. The novelty of their circumstance underscores the need for both realism and vision. Integrating them isn’t simple. But it’s their only course to seizing the opportunity they’ve been approved.
E.J. Dionne is a columnist for The Washington Post.