Tag Archives: claim

Claim Jumper replaces McCormick & & Schmick ' s at Hughes Center

Monday, Sept. 25, 2017|6 p.m.

Browse and turf enthusiasts have one less location to satisfy their yearnings now that McCormick & & Schmick’s has closed its doors.

The restaurant, located on Flamingo Road in the Hughes Center, shut down last weekend and will be replaced by a Claim Jumper on Saturday.

Both McCormick & & Schmick’s and Claim Jumper are owned by Landry’s Inc., a hospitality business that runs a number of other restaurant chains in addition to the Golden Nugget in downtown Las Vegas.

According to Terry Turney, Claim Jumper’s chief operating officer, the Claim Jumper moving into the place was located in the area Square, where it lost its lease at the upscale Las Vegas Boulevard shopping center.

“The Hughes location is an ideal fit for Claim Jumper, so we made the instant choice to change ideas,” Turney stated.

Judge enables Save Red Rock group'' s claim versus county to move forward

Image

Steve Marcus Considering that 2002, developers have actually tried to persuade Clark County to change the zoning on an old gypsum mine site about 5 miles from the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area, in the interest of developing a higher-density domestic project there.

A not-for-profit group received the OK to progress with its claim versus Clark County created to squash plans to develop thousands of house outside of Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area.

District Judge Jerry Wiese on Thursday rejected Clark County’s movement to dismiss the claim, in which the not-for-profit Save Red Rock alleges the county broke open meeting laws throughout a February conference related to the proposed 5,000-home advancement.

The suit likewise questions the validity of a concept strategy approved by Clark County commissioners in 2011. Conserve Red Rock believes the plan expired. Clark County and Plaster Resources, which owns the land and is working with builder Jim Rhodes on the proposed residential neighborhood, believe the strategy did not end and enables them to progress with their advancement plans.

Wiese heard arguments from both sides at a hearing on Aug. 17. Instead of rule from the bench that day, he selected a written choice, which he issued Thursday.

Attorneys for the county argued then that Save Red Rock did not file its open conferences law infraction claims within the statute of limitations set by the state. It likewise argued that the suit was irrelevant since physical advancement of the neighborhood is still reliant on a number of elements, including approval from the BLM to gain access to adjacent land it owns and ecological effect statements.

“We are losing time and taxpayer cash,” argued county lawyer Rob Warhola, “when it could all be for naught because the BLM denies their application.”

Wiese eventually disagreed, composing in the order: “Although the Court acknowledges that there are a number of contingencies which need to be fulfilled prior to houses can really be developed … the County and Plaster admittedly are pressing forward with the processing of (the 2011 plan) in the effort to establish the home which Save Red Rock is trying to safeguard. This Court must conclude that the credibility of the 2011 Specific Strategy and (Public Facilities Needs Evaluation) are at concern, and form the basis of a justiciable controversy between the celebrations.”

Clark County did not have immediate discuss the choice.

Save Red Rock was pleased with the outcome.

“We think it was a thoughtful decision,” says Save Red Rock lawyer Justin Jones, who is likewise running for a seat on the county commission. “We are extremely delighted with exactly what was a total success.”

The case now moves into the discovery stage, which Jones estimates may last 4 to 6 months.

Trump has surrendered claim to ethical management

Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2017|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s opinion area

It must not have taken the death and injury of innocents to move our country toward ethical clarity. It must not have actually taken President Donald Trump’s initial disgraceful refusal to condemn white supremacy, bigotry and Nazism to make clear to all who he is and which dark impulses he is willing to make use of to preserve his hold on power.

Those people who are white firmly insist that the racists and bigots are a minority of us and that the white-power movement is a limited and demented faction.

This holds true, and the chaos in Charlottesville, Va., called forth passionate condemnations of blood-and-soil nationalism throughout the spectrum of ideology. These types of witness were a required defense of the American idea and highlighted the shamefulness of Trump’s accept of moral equivalence. There are not, as Trump insisted Saturday, “lots of sides” to concerns that were settled long back: Racism, anti-Semitism, discrimination and white supremacy are unequivocally wrong.

A president who can not bring himself to say this instantly and unequivocally misuses any claim to moral leadership.

Advisers to the president aimed to tidy up after this ethical failure, putting out a statement Sunday morning– attributed to no one– declaring that “naturally” his condemnation of violence “consists of white supremacists, KKK, neo-Nazi and all extremist groups.” But if that “obviously” is sincere, why didn’t Trump state these things in the first location? And why hang on to the president’s inexcusable moral equivalence by including that expression “and all extremist groups?” This was merely a weak philosophical cover-up for a politician who has shown us his real instincts throughout his public life, from his birtherism to his unwillingness to turn away 2016 recommendations from Klansmen and other racists.

More Republicans than typical braked with Trump after his anemic reaction, and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, was particularly poignant in offering historical viewpoint on this episode: “My brother didn’t offer his life fighting Hitler for Nazi concepts to go undisputed here in your home.”

However that so many others in the party chosen to keep their discomfort on background was itself a scandal. “I cannot inform you how sick & & exhausted I am of the ‘independently wincing’ Republicans,” Peter Wehner, a veteran of three Republican administrations, tweeted. “It’s a self-incriminating silence.” Yes, it is.

The correct response is for Democrats and Republican politicians ready to decide to force a vote in Congress condemning the president for his opportunistic obtuseness and explaining where the large bulk of Americans stand on white supremacy. This is very important for many factors, however specifically to send out a message to America’s minorities that whites want to do more than deal rote condemnations of racism.

For make no mistake: No matter how precise it is to state that neo-Nazis and Klansmen represent a repugnant fringe, the fact that our president has regularly and successfully exploited white racial resentment can not assist however be taken by residents of color as a sign of bigotry’s persistent sturdiness.

The backlash to racial development is an old American story, from completion of Restoration forward.

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s words from 1967 speak to us still: “Loose and simple language about equality, resonant resolutions about brotherhood fall happily on the ear, however for the Negro, there is a trustworthiness space he can not neglect. He bears in mind that with each modest advance the white population immediately raises the argument that the Negro has actually come far enough. Each step forward accents an ever-present tendency to reaction.” This is exactly what we saw this weekend.

The battles over Confederate monoliths, in Charlottesville and elsewhere, reflect our trouble in acknowledging that these memorials are less historic markers than political statements. Many were put up clearly in assistance of Jim Crow and implicitly to reject the fact that the Southern cause in the Civil War was developed around a defense of slavery. Taking them down is a recommendation of exactly what history teaches, not a removal of the past.

But history is also being made now. As is always real with Trump, self-interest is the most efficient description for his actions: Under pressure from the Russia examination, he hesitates to alienate reaction citizens, who are among his most devoted advocates.

The rest of us, nevertheless, have a bigger responsibility to our country and to racial justice.

As the late civil rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer might recommend, it is time to inquire about Trump: When will we become sick and tired of being sick and exhausted?

E.J. Dionne is a columnist for The Washington Post.

Claim over '' sexy ' Statue of Liberty postage stamp set for trial

LAS VEGAS (FOX5) –

Is the Statue of Liberty reproduction in Las Vegas “sexier” than the Statue of Liberty in New york city City? An awkward accident involving the United States Postal Service and the Statue of Liberty is heading to federal court.

Back in 2011, the USPS suggested to utilize the actual statue on its forever stamp but instead inadvertently utilized the Las Vegas reproduction.

The worker managing the creation of the stamp supposedly picked a Getty picture of Girl Liberty in front of the New York-New York hotel-casino by error and printed four billion copies. The case is gone to trial in the United States Court of Federal Claims in September, where a judge will identify if the federal government will need to pay for that error.

Robert Davidson, the artist of the Las Vegas reproduction, took the postal service to court and submitted a copyright suit with the claim that his version was utilized without authorization. He stated that his variation of the Statue of Liberty is more “sultry” and “sexier than the initial”

The case has actually been a court fight ever since, however recently the court stated it could not rule on whether Davidson’s reproduction was various enough from the genuine thing to get approved for copyright infringement.

“I imply I don’t know that either of them are excessively attractive however if I have to pick I’m going to pick this one!,” tourist Becca Anderson laughed. “I feel like she has a slimmer face … A bit more pouty lips.”

Despite the fact that she chose the statue in Las Vegas and said she could tell the differences side by side, Anderson said she couldn’t discriminate based on simply looking at the postage stamp.

“Based on that little sector of her, no. I do not believe he has a case,” she said.

“I wouldn’t say that it’s sexier. I comprehend that it’s various,” traveler Xavier Peterson said. “He clearly does simply want money, however I think at the same time it’s still like a copyright thing.”

If they needed to choose, Peterson and her sweetheart Jacob Walker said they still think the initial Statue of Liberty is sexier.

“I think that she had a somewhat rougher night, however she’s still hotter you understand exactly what I indicate?” he stated. “If I’m being entirely truthful, simply the womanhood of this image is sexier.” Hey, uh

, weird concern but … which Statue of Liberty do you believe is more “attractive”? (See contrast above)

— Adam Herbets (@AdamHerbets) August 11, 2017 Copyright 2017 KVVU(KVVU Broadcasting Corporation). All rights booked.

GOP insurgents claim Trump mantle, spell trouble for party

Image

Steve Marcus In this file photo, Danny Tarkanian, then a Republican prospect for Congress, responds to a question during an interview at the Railroad Pass Casino Thursday, Oct. 20, 2016.

Tuesday, Aug. 8, 2017|8:43 p.m.

WASHINGTON– Republicans deal with an issue as they try to protect a slim majority in the Senate and win races in other places: Insurgent primary prospects are trying to lay claim to President Donald Trump’s mantle, and knock out the establishment’s choices.

The most recent case remains in Nevada, where endangered GOP incumbent Sen. Dean Heller drew an obstacle Tuesday from business person and repeat failed prospect Danny Tarkanian, who revealed his bid in a morning Fox News Channel appearance relatively aimed at an audience of one: the president himself.

“We’re never ever going to make America excellent once again unless we have senators in workplace that fully support President Trump and his America-first agenda,” Tarkanian stated, criticizing Heller as “one of the first never-Trumpers in Nevada” and arguing he had obstructed Trump’s program in Congress.

Heller opposed early variations of Trump-backed health care legislation in the Senate before voting for a last variation that failed anyhow. His campaign spokesman, Tommy Ferraro, dismissed Tarkanian as a “perennial candidate.”

The National Republican politician Senatorial Committee, which is the official Senate GOP project arm, quickly revealed its support for Heller, and an extremely PAC backed by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., devoted to investing exactly what it requires to support him and other GOP incumbents.

The vibrant mirrors longstanding clashes in between the GOP’s establishment and activist wings, which played out disastrously in 2010 and 2012 when hard-core conservatives won Senate primaries but went on to lose to Democrats. McConnell and his allies swore never to let that take place once again and have actually subsequently intervened in primaries when essential to produce candidates who might win.

The X factor now is the appeal Trump may hold to Republican primary voters– and what Trump himself will do.

Heller is hardly alone.

Next door in Arizona, GOP incumbent Sen. Jeff Flake, another Trump skeptic throughout last year’s campaign, deals with a minimum of one challenge from the right in conservative Kelli Ward, who consistently denounces Flake while praising Trump.

And in Alabama, in an unique Senate main election next week, the McConnell-backed super PAC, Senate Leadership Fund, dove in with millions to raise GOP Sen. Luther Strange against difficulties from a conservative House member, Mo Brooks, and previous state chief justice Roy Moore.

The Senate Leadership Fund advertising has been targeted at discrediting Brooks’ claims to support Trump and Moore’s fiscal conservatism, while promoting Strange, who called Trump’s election a “scriptural miracle,” as the true Trump ally in the race. Strange was recently designated to the Senate seat previously held by now-Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

In each case, to their annoyance, establishment-aligned Republicans face the prospect of spending millions to safeguard an incumbent from a challenger who may have a tough time leaving the basic election. Republicans hold a 52-48 Senate majority and are playing offense against Democratic incumbents in 10 states Trump won.

“It’s a vital time to make sure that Republican members understand, when they’re casting tough votes, that we’ll have their backs,” stated Steven Law, a former McConnell chief of staff who heads the Senate Management Fund, in explaining the choice to come in with millions to back Strange in Alabama.

The Alabama race underscores the concern of exactly what role the president will play in assisting his celebration’s down-ballot ambitions. With the contest next week, Trump finally addressed the matter with a tweet Tuesday night.

“Senator Luther Strange has actually done an excellent task representing individuals of the Great State of Alabama,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “He has my total and total endorsement!”

A former GOP Senate campaign authorities with understanding of the scenario said the NRSC has actually looked for help from the Trump White House on Senate races but those demands went unanswered under the management of Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, causing extensive frustration. The previous campaign official spoke on condition of anonymity to talk about internal party matters.

While Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have actually said they wish to increase the Republican bulks in your home and Senate, the White Home’s approach to contentious primaries isn’t really clear yet. And Trump has currently worked versus McConnell’s objectives, neglecting his pleas not to select former Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke, a most likely Senate candidate, as Interior secretary, while enhancing endangered Democratic Sens. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Manchin of West Virginia by hosting them at Trump Tower.

As for Heller, he is already walking the Trump tightrope.

Heller’s preliminary denunciation of a Senate plan to repeal and change Obamacare drew the ire of a political not-for-profit promoting Trump’s agenda. America First Policies connected Heller to Home Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in a social media push and threatened to invest more than $1 million trashing him on tv and radio on his house grass. McConnell called the group’s attacks “beyond stupid.”

In addition to the healthcare episode, Heller in 2015 stated he was donating Trump’s previous campaign contributions to charity– a move he announced after Trump came under fire for identifying some prohibited immigrants from Mexico as rapists. For a president with a notoriously long memory for slights, Heller may have little hope of returning into his good graces.

Taylor Swift, ex-radio host head to court over groping claim

Image

John Salangsang/ Invision/ AP Taylor Swift carries out at the DirecTV Now Super Saturday Night Show at Club Nomadic on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2017 in Houston, Texas.

Friday, Aug. 4, 2017|2:05 p.m.

DENVER– Taylor Swift and her assistance team didn’t call cops after she stated she had been groped by a Denver radio host throughout an image session before a concert.

Rather, they called his manager, and David Mueller lost his job. The video jockey later on took legal action against the singer-songwriter, stating he had actually been incorrectly accused and wanted $3 million in damages.

Swift countersued, declaring sexual assault, establishing a civil trial set to start Monday in federal court in Denver that will largely turn on who the eight-member jury thinks.

Swift is scheduled to affirm. Both sides say no settlement remains in the works.

The claims provide differing accounts of backstage events before Swift performed at a 2013 concert at the Pepsi Center in Denver.

Swift aimed to keep the circumstance “discreet and peaceful and confidential” and was distressed by Mueller’s claim that “for some reason she might have some incentive to actually make this story,” her attorney, Douglas Baldridge, has actually argued in court.

Swift is looking for a verdict that awards her $1, while holding Mueller accountable and “acting as an example to other women who might resist publicly reliving similar outrageous and embarrassing acts,” her lawsuit states.

Some entertainment lawyers state celebrities often want to deal with such scenarios outside court.

“When celebs choose to take legal action, it’s going to hit the press, they’re going to be called as a witness and they have to hang out with that,” stated Tre Lovell, a California-based lawyer who represents production and entertainment management companies.

“They do not necessarily want that. They want to concentrate on their career, their brand names, their sponsorships. They have a whole profits stream that’s at stake,” Lovell stated.

With a lot at stake, Michael Niborski, a lawyer whose company represents Bruno Mars and Kanye West, stated Swift “is especially well-suited to represent women’s rights, female empowerment and not taking this type of behavior.”

Mueller, then 51, was an early morning host at a Denver country-music station when he was designated to participate in Swift’s June 2, 2013, show.

Swift, then 23, was exploring in support of her “Red” album, with hits such as “I Understood You Were Difficulty” and “We Are Never ever Ever Returning Together.”

Mueller and his girlfriend lined up backstage with other fans for a meet-and-greet with Swift and went into a curtained enclosure where they spoke briefly with the singer-songwriter.

A guard and a minimum of 2 other Swift team members were present when it came time for a picture. Mueller stated he delved into the image at the last second.

Mueller stated Swift was cordial as he and his sweetheart left. He went to his cars and truck to drop off an autographed picture then returned to the arena, where he was faced by Swift’s guard.

In court files, Swift stated, “He took his hand and put it up my gown and grabbed onto my ass cheek, and no matter what does it cost? I scooted over, it was still there.”

She stated she fulfilled and greeted other fans, then reported the incident to the guard and a photographer.

Mueller rejected wrongly touching Swift and said he informed the guard: “Please call the authorities. I didn’t do anything.”

Under regional law, such an act would warrant a misdemeanor charge of unlawful sexual conduct, which carries a maximum possible sentence of two years in prison. No criminal charges are pending.

After escorting Mueller from the arena, a member of Swift’s group called Mueller’s boss and asked that suitable action be taken.

The radio station talked to Mueller and fired him, mentioning a morality provision in his agreement that enables his company to fire him for conduct that could reflect unfavorably on the station or its sponsors, court documents say.

The documents also say an agent of the station stated Mueller had actually altered his story from not having touched Swift to potentially touching her incidentally or mistakenly.

Mueller’s lawyer, Gabriel McFarland, argues that Mueller might have been misidentified after somebody else touched Swift.

He also says the security guard did not respond to anything during the backstage meeting and that as many as 20 other people took pictures with Swift after Mueller left.

The trial is being kept in U.S. District Court since the Mueller and Swift reside in separate states and the matter involves a claim for damages greater than $75,000.

Senate Republicans claim progress on health care legislation

Image

J. Scott Applewhite/ AP Senate Bulk Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., flanked by Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., left, and Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, consults with press reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 6, 2017.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017|12:56 p.m.

WASHINGTON– Senate Republicans say they’re nearing consensus on health care legislation as they head toward a make-or-break vote by the Fourth of July.

They narrowed down legal options at a conference Tuesday participated in by Vice President Mike Pence.

Bulk Leader Mitch McConnell told press reporters afterward that “We’re getting close to having a proposal to whip and to require to the flooring. It’s been 7 years to speak about health care.”

McConnell and other congressional GOP leaders later on met with President Donald Trump at the White House. Trump applauded your home for passing its own healthcare expense and motivated the Senate to “follow suit and get a bill across the goal this summer.”

Nevertheless, it’s still unclear that the emerging Senate costs will have enough votes to pass.

Louisville penetrating claim staffer got escorts for recruits

Friday, Oct. 2, 2015|3:04 p.m.

Louisville says it has launched an examination into accusations that previous Cardinals staffer Andre McGee paid an escort service to offer sex for recruits.

The allegations by Katina Powell are in an upcoming book from a publishing arm of the Indianapolis Business Journal. Some details of the book were released Friday on the Journal’s web site and said that McGee worked with Powell to offer strippers and woman of the streets for employees and a few of their daddies throughout a four-year duration.

Louisville issued a statement Friday stating it found out of the accusations in August and right away notified the NCAA. McGee left Louisville in 2014 to become an assistant at Missouri-Kansas City. The school and McGee could not be right away grabbed comment Friday afternoon.

Black women booted from Napa Valley wine train file claim

Image

Jeff Chiu/ AP

Complainants Lisa Johnson, left, hugs Deborah Neal before a news conference announcing the submitting a claim over their ejection from a Napa Valley Wine Train, Thursday, Oct. 1, 2015, in San Francisco. A group of primarily black women who were ejected from a Northern California wine country train this summertime say they felt embarrassed and cannot think they were treated that way in 2015.

Thursday, Oct. 1, 2015|9:35 p.m.

SAN FRANCISCO– A group of primarily black women filed a racial discrimination suit Thursday after they were gotten rid of from a train that tours Napa Valley wineries, stating it was humiliating to be shaken off a rail car when loud and inebriated white passengers were enabled to remain.

The 11 ladies sued Napa Valley Wine Train Inc., declaring they were singled out since of race and seeking $11 million in damages. The business said in a statement that it takes accusations of discrimination really seriously and has hired a previous FBI agent to examine.

The ladies said many of them were part of a book club that satisfies frequently and had actually gathered on the train to go over a romance book. Prior to the train left the station in Napa, a train worker inquired to quiet down because they were upseting other travelers, they stated.

The same staff member admonished them a 2nd time prior to informing them that policeman would be waiting for them when the train reached St. Helena, the suit says. They were escorted through numerous automobiles as other passengers stared and then off the train and into a dirt lot where cops were waiting, according to the suit.

“That was the most embarrassing experience that I have ever had in my whole life,” Lisa Johnson, 47, said with splits in her eyes, appearing with a few of the other females at a press conference announcing the lawsuit. “This is 2015, and this just can not take place once again.”

The wine train released an apology after the ladies were ejected, assuring additional training for workers on multiculturalism and level of sensitivity and totally free passes for a future journey.

The claim likewise asserts the females were disparaged by a business declaration stating they had been verbally and physically violent.

Their elimination led to discussion online under the hashtag, #laughingwhileblack. The ladies put on black buttons with the hashtag at Thursday’s news conference.

Katherine Neal, 85, the oldest female in the group, said she was advised of when she had to do with 12 and a shop clerk asked her to consume her ice cream outside while white families consumed inside.

“I took this case since it’s an egregious case,” stated the women’s attorney, Waukeen McCoy. “This suit highlights that blacks are still being discriminated in America.”

McCoy stated he engaged in settlement talks with the company, however it did not make an offer.

The Napa Valley Wine Train offers food and wine to travelers as they check out Napa County wineries in upgraded Pullman vehicles.

A representative for the company, Sam Singer, has stated individuals or groups are asked to get off the wine train as soon as a month generally for various factors.

Steve Wynn to pay $422,380 in legal costs in lost defamation claim

Image

L.E. Baskow

Steve Wynn offers a keynote address during the International Video gaming Expo at the Sands Expo on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2014.

Thursday, June 25, 2015|1:44 p.m.

. A California judge has ordered gambling establishment magnate Steve Wynn to pay $422,380 in legal costs and costs to the Wall Street hedge fund manager Wynn demanded defamation.

Las week District Judge William H. Orrick decreased the quantity Chanos asked for– $590,699– stating he didn’t offer materials validating exceptionally high hourly-rates for paralegals and the large number of lawyer hours.

A Wynn representative declined to comment.

Orrick dismissed Wynn’s case in March under California’s anti-SLAPP statute that aims to stop lawsuits suppressing complimentary speech. The judge said statements by Chanos about Wynn and Wynn Resorts Ltd. at a UC Berkeley scholastic conference were not defamatory.

Wynn backed a state law this year aimed at weakening Nevada’s anti-SLAPP provisions. Lawmakers passed a watered-down variation maintaining the majority of the exact same securities.