Tag Archives: elections

Trump presidency faces high stakes in midterm elections

Image

Janie Osborne/ AP President Donald Trump speaks throughout a campaign rally at Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, Saturday, Nov. 3, 2018, in Belgrade, Mont.

Sunday, Nov. 4, 2018|9:52 a.m.

WASHINGTON– President Donald Trump has been imitating a candidate on the ballot today, staging everyday double-header rallies and blasting out advertisements for Republicans up for election on Tuesday. Offered the stakes for his presidency, he might also be.

A knot of investigations. Partisan gridlock. A cautioning shot for his re-election bid. Trump faces potentially devastating fallout must Republicans lose control of one or both chambers in Congress, ending 2 years of GOP hegemony in Washington. A White House that has actually struggled to stay on course under beneficial situations would be checked in significant ways. A president who often fights his own party would face a far less forgiving opposition.

On the flip side, if Republicans preserve control of the House and Senate, that’s not just a victory for the GOP however likewise a recognition of Trump’s brand of politics and his non-traditional presidency. That outcome, considered less likely even within the White Home, would push the president as he introduces his own re-election quote.

White House aides firmly insist the president doesn’t spend much time considering defeat, but he has actually begun to try to calibrate expectations. He has actually concentrated on the competitive Senate races in the last days of his scorched-earth campaign blitz, and he has distanced himself from blame should Republicans lose your house. If that takes place, he plans to claim victory, arguing his efforts on the project trail narrowed GOP losses and helped them hold the Senate, according to a person familiar with Trump’s thinking who was not authorized to discuss White Home conversations by name and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Throughout the campaign, Trump has been checking out other explanations– pointing to historical headwinds for the celebration of an incumbent president and grumbling about a rash of GOP retirements this year. He told The Associated Press last month that he won’t bear any obligation should Democrats take over.

At a rally in West Virginia on Friday, a bold Trump rejected the prospect of a Democratic House takeover. “It could happen,” he stated, including, “Do not stress over it. I’ll simply figure it out.”

Meanwhile, his personnel has begun preparations to deal with a flood of subpoenas that could get here next year from Democrat-controlled committees, and the White House counsel’s office has actually been attempting to draw in skilled attorneys to field oversight queries.

Should they take the House, Democrats are currently plotting to reopen your home intelligence committee’s examination into the Trump project’s ties to Russia. Other committees are outlining aggressive oversight of Trump’s administration and his web of business interests. Some Democrats are taking a look at using your house Ways and Method Committee to obtain copies of the president’s income tax return after he braked with years of custom and withheld them from public scrutiny throughout his project for the White Home.

A slim Republican majority in your home would also provide difficulties, most likely inflaming simmering intraparty conflicts. First amongst them would be a potentially bitter management fight in your home to change retiring Speaker Paul Ryan. However a narrowed majority would likewise exacerbate departments over policy– and continued combined control might leave the GOP dealing with the blame for gridlock.

” Clearly there’s a horrible lot on the line in regards to the legal program,” stated Republican politician expert Josh Holmes. “The prospect of a Democratic controlled House or Senate puts a major wrinkle in getting anything through Congress.”

Some in the White Home believe losing to the Democrats might actually be more suitable. They view Democrats’ eagerness to investigate the president as a blessing in camouflage in the run-up to 2020. They view Home Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi as a potent foil for Trump and think they can tag the party responsible for Washington dysfunction.

Ari Fleischer, George W. Bush’s press secretary, stated Democratic control of the House “has both peril and pledge for the president.”

” The hazard is subpoenas, examinations, legal costs and headaches,” he stated. “The guarantee is Trump will have a simple foil to run versus: Pelosi and Democratic leadership.”

White Home aides have actually gone over floating popular legal concerns, such as infrastructure, to lure Democrats and check the unity of the Democratic opposition.

While keeping your house remains an uphill struggle for the GOP, Trump and Republicans have actually attempted to sell citizens on the possibility of another 2 years of GOP control. They promised hard-line immigration policies and more tax cuts, arguing that Democrats would eliminate two years of progress.

In the closing weeks of the midterms, Trump has actually unleashed a no-holds-barred effort to enhance Republicans as he dipped into the very same undercurrents of anxiousness that defined his 2016 project– from stoking fears about unlawful migration to warning of economic collapse if Democrats are triumphant.

However a House loss will trigger GOP hand-wringing about the divides in the celebration and the battles for moderate Republicans to run in the Trump age, as well as raise concerns about whether the Democratic gains point to a path for governmental hopefuls in 2020.

Democratic specialist Jim Manley stated Tuesday may reveal if Democrats are having any success regaining white working-class citizens in the Midwest who backed Trump in 2016.

” Trump is helping. He’s ending up being increasingly more radioactive,” Manley stated. “There’s a chance to try and win them back over.”

However while the results might expose weak points in the Republican coalition, midterm elections are very various than governmental years. Republicans fasted to point out that the party in power generally suffers beats in midterms. Former President Barack Obama was, in his words, “shellacked” in 2010 and went on to win re-election in 2012.

Said Fleischer: “In the consequences, individuals will overemphasize its significance and in 2 years’ time, everything will have altered.”

Pompeo: U.S. will combat Russian interference in 2018 elections

Wednesday, May 23, 2018|8:56 a.m.

WASHINGTON– Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Wednesday the Trump administration will not endure Russian interference in the 2018 congressional midterm elections.

Pompeo informed the House Foreign Affairs Committee that the administration will take “suitable countermeasures” to eliminate exactly what he called “continued efforts” by Russia to meddle in November’s vote. He did not elaborate on the Russian interference or state exactly what the countermeasures would be but stated there was a lot more work to be done to stop Russia’s efforts.

He said the U.S. had actually not yet had the ability to develop “efficient deterrence” to halt them.

The top-ranking Democrat on the committee, Eliot Engel, however, contended that the Trump administration “is giving Russia a pass” because Russian President Vladimir Putin “supported President Trump over Hillary Clinton” in the 2016 governmental election.

“If we allow foreign disturbance in our elections so long as it supports our political goals, then we have actually put party prior to country and put our democracy in crisis,” Engel stated.

Russian meddling in the governmental election stays a sensitive subject for President Donald Trump, as the White House attempts to combat the danger posed by unique counsel Robert Mueller’s examination into prospective ties between Russia and the Trump campaign. Trump rejects there was any collusion.

Pompeo was making his very first congressional look since becoming leading diplomat nearly a month back, after Trump fired his predecessor, Rex Tillerson.

Pompeo was affirming on the State Department’s budget plan, operations and policy concerns, but was asked about a large range of concerns, varying from diplomacy with North Korea, the pullout from the Iran nuclear deal, and Russia.

“We will not endure Russian disturbance in the 2018 elections,” he told lawmakers. “We will take proper countermeasures to ongoing Russian efforts.”

He protected the Trump administration’s “enormous efforts to press back against Russia,” which he declared were “light-years better than exactly what was done in the previous administration.”

Trump thrusts abortion fight into essential midterm elections

Image

Manuel Balce Ceneta/ AP In this Jan. 19, 2018, picture, President Donald Trump speaks to individuals of the yearly March for Life occasion, in the Rose Garden of the White Home in Washington.

Friday, May 18, 2018|3:52 p.m.

WASHINGTON– The Trump administration acted Friday to bar taxpayer-funded family planning centers from referring ladies for abortions, energizing its conservative political base ahead of vital midterm elections while setting the phase for new legal fights.

The Health and Human Services Department sent its proposal to rewrite the guidelines to the White Home, setting in motion a regulatory process that might take months. Little on details, an administration summary of the plan stated it would echo a Reagan-era guideline by banning abortion referrals by federally funded centers and prohibiting them from locating in facilities that likewise provide abortions.

Planned Being a parent, a primary provider of family planning, abortion services and basic preventive take care of women, said the strategy appears created to target the company. “Completion outcome would make it difficult for females to come to Planned Being a parent, who are depending on us every day,” stated executive vice president Dawn Laguens.

However presidential counselor Kellyanne Conway told Fox News that the administration is just recognizing “that abortion is not household planning. This is household preparing loan.”

The policy was derided as a “gag guideline” by abortion rights supporters, a point challenged by the administration, which said therapy about abortion would be OKAY, but not recommendations. It’s most likely to set off lawsuits from challengers, and certain to galvanize activists on both sides of the abortion dispute entering into November’s congressional elections.

The policy “would ensure that taxpayers do not indirectly fund abortions,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a declaration.

Social and religious conservatives have actually stayed steadfastly devoted to President Donald Trump despite concerns like his compensations to attorney Michael Cohen, who paid hush cash to a pornography star alleging an affair, and Trump’s past boasts of sexually aggressive habits. Trump has actually not wavered from advancing the program of the religious right.

Tuesday night, Trump is set up to speak at the Susan B. Anthony List’s “project for life” gala. The group works to elect candidates who wish to lower and ultimately end abortion. It says it spent more than $18 million in the 2016 election cycle to beat Hillary Rodham Clinton and promote a “pro-life Senate.”

The initial Reagan-era household planning guideline disallowed clinics from talking about abortion with females. It never ever entered into effect as written, although the Supreme Court ruled it was a suitable use of executive power. The policy was rescinded under President Costs Clinton, and a brand-new rule took effect requiring “nondirective” therapy to consist of a complete variety of alternatives for women.

The Trump administration said its proposition will roll back the Clinton requirement that abortion be talked about as a choice in addition to prenatal care and adoption.

Known as Title X, the family-planning program serves about 4 million women a year through centers, costing taxpayers about $260 million.

Although abortion is politically divisive, the United States abortion rate has dropped considerably, from about 29 per 1,000 ladies of reproductive age in 1980 to about 15 in 2014. Much better birth control, less unexpected pregnancies and state constraints may have played a role, inning accordance with a current scientific report.

Abortion remains legal, however federal family preparation funds can not be utilized to spend for the procedure. Planned Being a parent centers now receive Title X family preparation grants, however they keep that cash different from funds that pay for abortions.

Abortion challengers state a taxpayer-funded program ought to have no connection to abortion. Physicians’ groups and abortion rights advocates say a ban on therapy ladies trespasses on the doctor-patient relationship.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said the administration action totals up to an “outright invasion” in the doctor-patient relationship and might require medical professionals to leave out “essential, medically accurate info” from counseling sessions with clients.

Planned Parenthood’s Laguens hinted at legal action, stating, “we will not wait while our basic healthcare and rights are stripped away.”

Jessica Marcella of the National Family Preparation & & Reproductive Health Association, which represents clinics, stated requiring physical separation from abortion centers is unwise and would interfere with services for females.

” I can not picture a scenario where public health groups would allow this effort to go undisputed,” Marcella stated.

However abortion challengers said Trump is merely declaring the core objective of the household planning program.

” The brand-new regulations will draw a brilliant line in between abortion centers and household preparation programs, just as … federal law requires and the Supreme Court has actually upheld,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Household Research Study Council, an essential voice for religious conservatives.

Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life of America said, “Abortion is not health care or birth control and many females want natural healthcare options, instead of hormone-induced changes.”

Abortion opponents allege the federal household preparation program in impact cross-subsidizes abortions offered by Planned Parenthood, whose clinics are also major receivers of grants for family planning and fundamental preventive care. Hawkins’ group is distributing a petition to urge lawmakers to support the Trump administration’s proposal.

Abortion challengers say the administration plan is not a “gag rule.” It “will not forbid therapy for clients about abortion … but neither will it consist of the existing mandate that (centers) need to counsel and refer for abortion,” said the administration’s own summary.

Associated Press author David Crary in New york city contributed to this report.

Community elections: Fiore dominates amid a rough night for incumbents

Image

Steve Marcus Michele Fiore speaks throughout a town hall meeting sponsored by the Southern Hills Republican Women’s Club at Buckman’s Grille in Henderson Tuesday, April 26, 2016.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017|11:30 p.m.

. It appears that 4 incumbents will be ousted and one familiar face will go back to a chosen workplace after Tuesday’s municipal election results are completed.

Here’s a breakdown:

City of Las Vegas, Ward 6

Previous Assemblywoman Michele Fiore defeated Kelli Ross for the Las Vegas City board Ward 6 seat. The ladies were vying to change the latter’s partner, Councilman Steve Ross, who was couldn’t re-run due to describe limits.

Fiore secured 3,885 votes, or 51.1 percent. Ross protected 3,720 votes, or 48.9 percent.

A thank-you e-mail sent by Fiore to advocates checked out: “Simply as I have been your advocate in the state legislature, I will continue to battle to improve the lifestyle in Las Vegas and make our community the very best in the nation to live, work and play.”

City of Las Vegas, Ward 2

Las Vegas Councilman Bob Beers lost his Ward 2 seat to retired Air Force Col. Steve Seroka.

Seroka, who was running for office for the first time, secured 3,979 votes, or 54 percent. Beers secured 3,387 votes, or 46 percent.

Beers’ approval of a proposition to transform the shuttered Badlands golf course into property real estate played heavily in the race.

On election night, Seroka thanked his fans and family for running a grass-roots campaign that he said included knocking on about 40,000 doors.

“I’m really excited,” he included. “To go from new man to victory …”

City of North Las Vegas, Ward 3

North Las Vegas Councilwoman Anita Wood lost her Ward 3 seat to challenger Scott Black.

Black received 1,759 votes, or 54.1 percent. The incumbent got 1,493 votes, or 45.9 percent.

Wood has represented Ward 3 because 2009. Black is a newcomer to politics however was endorsed by North Las Vegas Mayor John Lee and the North Las Vegas Police Officers Association.

City of Henderson, Ward 3

Henderson Councilman John Marz successfully safeguarded his Ward 3 seat against opposition Carrie Cox.

Marz received 7,115 votes, or 51.6 percent. Cox got 6,675 votes, or 48.4 percent.

Marz was the only incumbent to maintain his seat throughout the community basic elections.

On election night, Marz thanked his group and stated he is anticipating a great deal of good things to happen in Henderson during the next four years.

He added, “I enjoy to be a part of it.”

Municipal Court Judge, Dept. 3, Las Vegas

Incumbent Heidi Almase lost her seat to opposition Cara Campbell. Campbell protected 11,822 votes, or 52.9 percent. Almase protected 10,544 votes, or 47.1 percent.

City board, Boulder City

Warren C. Harhay and Kiernan McManus earned their way onto Boulder City’s City board by earning more votes than John Milburn and incumbent Councilman Webcam Walker. Harhay secured 27.9 percent of votes while McManus secured 26.3 percent.

Stone City, Questions

Stone City locals had two tally questions to choose. Both were comfortably beat.

Question 1 concerned loosening up limitations on the city’s controlled-growth ordinance; 71.2 percent voted versus it.

Concern 2 asked citizens whether they authorized of a full interchange on Interstate 11; 58.2 percent voted against it.

Low Turnout

Citizen turnout for the getting involved towns was 8.68 percent in general. That’s lower than the turnout for local main elections kept in April, which had an overall turnout of 9.48 percent.

Boulder City saw the highest turnout rate with 42.5 percent. North Las Vegas saw a voter turnout rate of 10.3 percent. Henderson and Las Vegas cannot make it into double-digit percentages, seeing rates of 8.2 and 7.6 percent, respectively.