Friday, April 6, 2018|2 a.m.
View more of the Sun’s opinion area
After two years of stonewalling about its theft of Gerardo Serrano’s 2014 Ford F-250 pickup, the federal government all of a sudden returned it. It sparkled from having actually been cleaned and detailed, bumper to bumper, and it had four brand-new tires and a brand-new battery. The government probably hoped that, mollified by the truck’s sprucing-up, Serrano would let bygones be bygones and return to Kentucky. This was another mistake by our mistake-prone government.
Assisted by litigators from the Institute for Justice (IJ), whose look on the West Texas horizon most likely stressed the federal government into pretending to be obedient, Serrano wishes to make the government less larcenous and more constitutional when it is enhancing itself through civil loss.
On Sept. 21, 2015, Serrano drove up to the Eagle Pass, Texas, border crossing, meaning to attempt to interest a Mexican cousin in broadening his photovoltaic panel setup organisation in the United States. To have mementos of his journey, he took some photos of the border with his cellphone camera, which frustrated 2 U.S. Custom and Border Defense (CBP) representatives, who demanded the password to his phone. Serrano, who is exactly what an American ought to be regarding his rights, irritable, chose not to send to such an unwarranted invasion of his personal privacy. One representative said he was “fed up with hearing about your rights” and “you have no rights here.” So, they searched his truck– this was unusual for a vehicle leaving the country– and one representative exclaimed, “We got him!”
Having actually found five.380 quality bullets in the truck’s center console– he has a concealed-carry authorization but had no weapon with him– they handcuffed him and took his truck under civil forfeit, stating it had actually been used to carry “munitions of war.” The next time somebody warns about the capacity for domestic abuse of supposed national security procedures, do not dismiss them as an unstable libertarian.
Civil forfeiture is the power to seize property believed of being produced by, or involved in, crime. In this “Through the Looking-Glass,” guilty-until-proven-innocent inversion, the home’s owners bear the problem of proving that they were not associated with such activity, which can be a pricey and protracted procedure as persons must employ legal representatives and do battle with a government wielding unrestricted resources. Law enforcement agencies get to keep the profits from surrendered property, which gives them an incentive to do exactly what a lot of them do– abuse the procedure. However, then, the procedure– punishment prior to a crime is shown– is inherently abusive.
The federal government appears mystified that Serrano will not leave bad sufficient alone, and repel. It states he got his truck back after a simple 25 months, so “there is not any case or debate.” Serrano states, let me count the methods I have actually been hurt by “thugs with badges.”
Before the government would deign to promise (falsely, it turned out) to give him due process– to permit him to ask for a judicial hearing– it extorted from Serrano a bond of 10 percent of the truck’s worth ($3,804.99). The federal government quickly cashed his check (not up until the IJ cavalry rode in did he get his refund). The hearing never took place. During the 2 years Serrano lacked the truck, he needed to continue making $672.97 regular monthly payments on it, and he had to pay more than $700 to insure it, $1,004.61 to register it in Kentucky and thousands more for rental cars.
Serrano is suing for restitution, however also seeking a class-action judgment on behalf of others who have actually been similarly maltreated. Simply at Eagle Pass, one of 73 crossing points on the U.S.-Mexico border, the CBP takes, usually, well more than 100 Americans’ automobiles a year. Serrano seeks to develop a right to prompt post-seizure judicial hearings. These would be improvements, however of a process that needs radical modification, if not abolition.
Robert Everett Johnson is one of the IJ legal representatives whose interest in the case galvanized the CBP’s hitherto dormant interest in Serrano’s rights. Johnson says: “Picture being apprehended at an airport checkpoint since you innocently forgot to take a tube of tooth paste from your travel luggage. However instead of asking you to toss it out or put it in a plastic bag, the TSA agents informed you they were seizing all your travel luggage, including the toothpaste tube.” That took place to Serrano at the hands of a government– the one north of the border– that don’t hesitated to state, “You have no rights here.”
George Will is a writer for The Washington Post.