Tag Archives: keeps

Supreme Court keeps a lower profile, but for how long?

U.S. Supreme Court

 U.S. Supreme Court J. Scott Applewhite/ AP In this Nov. 30, 2018, file image, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court gather for an official group portrait at the Supreme Court Building in Washington. Seated from left: Partner Justice Stephen Breyer, Partner Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Partner Justice Samuel Alito Jr. Standing behind from left: Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, Partner Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Elena Kagan and Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh.

Friday, Dec. 28, 2018|3:18 p.m.

WASHINGTON– The Supreme Court began its term with the tumultuous confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, followed by a studied avoidance of drama on the high court bench– especially anything that would divide the five conservatives and 4 liberals.

The justices have actually been uncommonly solicitous of each other in the courtroom since Kavanaugh’s verification, and several have voiced issue that the public views the court as merely a political organization. Chief Justice John Roberts appears determined to lead the one Washington organization that stays above the political fray. Even Roberts’ rebuke of President Donald Trump, after the president criticized a federal judge, remained in defense of an independent, apolitical judiciary.

The next few weeks will evaluate whether the calm can last.

When they gather in private on Jan. 4 to think about brand-new cases for arguments in April and into next term, the justices will confront a raft of high-profile appeals.

Abortion constraints, work environment discrimination against LGBT people and partisan gerrymandering are on the program. Close behind are appeals from the Trump administration seeking to have the court permit it to end an Obama-era program that shields young immigrants from deportation and to put in place restrictive rules for transgender soldiers.

There already are indications that the conservative justices, apart from Roberts, are willing to take on controversial cases that are likely to produce the ideological and partisan divisions that their coworkers seem eager to prevent.

In recent weeks, 3 conservative justices implicated the court of ducking its job of choosing essential cases, particularly when lower courts have actually disagreed on the outcome. Their criticism, composed by Justice Clarence Thomas and signed up with by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, came after a current decision to avoid a case including funding for Planned Being a parent.

Then, on the Friday prior to Christmas, the court divided 5-4 in refusing to permit the Trump administration to impose new restrictions on asylum applicants. Roberts joined the four liberals. The 3 conservatives who were displeased by the Planned Being a parent case result again noted their difference, this time joined by Kavanaugh.

The 2 votes can’t be utilized to draw any firm conclusions about what may be occurring behind closed doors at the court, as the cases got here in various circumstances. In the Planned Being a parent case, the justices were considering whether to approve complete review, a process that takes only 4 votes. The asylum case was an emergency appeal from the administration. At least 5 of the 9 justices would have needed to enact the administration’s favor.

But Lawrence Solum, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University’s law school, stated Roberts appears to have 2 reasons to limit the court’s involvement in hot-button cases: his choice for taking little steps in the law and his concern for the court’s reputation.

” It’s clear that 5-4 choices will be viewed by lots of, lots of attorneys, many political leaders and large numbers of the public at large as ideological choices,” Solum said. “So given Roberts’ desire to preserve the authenticity of the court, he might be extremely motivated to prevent choices like that in the next immediate duration in the history of the court. Whether that’s one year, or more years or 5 years, who understands?”

The court got to this point after an unusual chain of occasions that began with the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016. Senate Republicans refused to act upon President Barack Obama’s election of Merrick Garland, allowing Trump to put Gorsuch on the court in 2017. To this day, Democrats state the seat was stolen from them.

Then, over the summer season, Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement meant that Trump would also get to replace the court’s swing vote with a more reputable conservative. Kavanaugh’s track record as an appellate judge recommended he was that guy, but his confirmation was nearly derailed by claims of sexual assault, which Kavanaugh denied.

The allegations versus Kavanaugh turned the verification process into a national phenomenon that culminated in a hearing with Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, who accused him of attack when they were in high school. Republicans said the claims was unproven and verified Kavanaugh in a rare Saturday session. Spotlighting how emotional the debate had become, a crowd of demonstrators gathered at the Supreme Court structure after the Kavanaugh vote, with some climbing the stone statues that line the steps.

One result of the Kavanaugh chaos has been the most severe conversation in years of limiting the court’s powers, including potentially increasing the variety of justices, Solum said. “It recommends that the authenticity of the court is at concern now in maybe a way it hasn’t been until just recently.”

Roberts is not only the chief justice, however he has actually basically taken Kennedy’s place as the swing vote– the conservative justice nearest the court’s center. The Supreme Court will go just as far as Roberts wants in either direction.

He can attempt to keep the court totally out of some cases, though that requires him to be able to persuade at least another conservative justice to go along. That’s what took place in the Planned Parenthood case, when Kavanaugh voted to reject evaluation. “The difficult verification battle might result in a bit of care,” said John McGinnis, a Northwestern University law school professor.

When the justices do plunge into debate, Roberts will be able “to compose or insist that choices be narrowly drawn,” McGinnis stated.

Roberts has been primary justice for more than 13 years, however he is just 63 and could lead the court for an additional twenty years or more. That permits Roberts, who started his legal profession as a legal representative in the Reagan administration, to take a viewpoint, McGinnis stated, and await a time when political tensions and issues about the court’s credibility subside.

Playing for Keeps

In a 2016 TED talk Sue Klebold offered about her kid Dylan Klebold, among the 2 shooters at Columbine High School, she stated, “I’ve learned that no matter just how much we wish to believe we can, we can unknown or control everything our loved ones believe and feel … (and) the persistent belief that someone we love would never consider hurting themselves or someone else can cause us to miss exactly what’s hidden in plain sight.”

Her words underscore the significance of avoidance. For Michael McCreery, assistant professor of interaction and media sciences in UNLV’s College of Education, that involves children at risk of socioemotional and behavioral issues.

“If we can identify children that show violent behavior or aggressive tendencies and get them help, we can change the course of their whole life,” McCreery stated.

He believes he’s discovered a method to do this through means that media experts often mention as an impetus of violence: video games.

Scientists and educators alike have long argued for the academic value of video games. McCreery stated that till very recently, little had actually been done to use video games as a mental and academic assessment tool, but he and his coworkers at UNLV’s Interaction and Media Sciences Lab have actually begun to check out the choice.

“We are analyzing how private distinctions, such as aggressiveness, influence within-game behavioral options,” McCreery said. “This shift in focus from game results (winning or losing) to procedure (within-game choices) has actually unlocked to a brand-new model of assessment, one that allows us to focus particularly on the behavioral choices made throughout social experiences.”

In the last few years, computer game designers have actually obtained from the Select Your very own Adventure book format to build what are called moral-choice, or forced-choice, video games. In numerous computer games, consequences are the result of an interaction and ramifications stretch no further than the moment. Moral-choice game design, nevertheless, depends upon the concept that within-game behavioral options change how the story unfolds. The player’s actions not just affect a particular moment of gameplay but likewise have future repercussions on results in the video game that are unknown to the gamer when the option is made.

A player’s actions to those in-game experiences makes it possible for McCreery and his colleagues to look at triggers, or scenarios that spark aggressive behavior, as well as how linked circumstances may cause escalating outbursts and violence.

To evaluate whether a moral-choice computer game could mirror a standard mental assessment, the lab team utilized an existing video game, The Deed, and coded in-game choices in relation to answers discovered in a conventional assessment.

The outcomes were appealing; data from the trials showed that respondents’ in-game actions duplicated mental assessment findings related to hostility, opening the possibility for mental health professionals to include technology-based evaluations like video games to their tool belts.

“Using this technique, we have actually had the ability to analyze habits in a social situation as it unfolds and link those choices to more conventional kinds of evaluation,” McCreery stated. “In doing so, we approximate that when games are purposefully developed with assessment in mind, they may better assist in assisting experts determine children in need of socioemotional assistance that may otherwise fail the cracks,” McCreery stated.

Formerly, the only methods for determining kids at risk for aggressive behavior have been instructors, class observations, and mental screenings. While these tools have actually been valuable, they are limited.

For instance, a range of elements affect instructor recommendations, including their predispositions, class management skills, and general stress– all which impacts the accuracy of their assessments, inning accordance with Richard Abidin and Lina Robinson’s research study “Stress, Predispositions, or Professionalism: What Drives Educators’ Recommendation Judgments of Trainees With Challenging Behaviors?” in the Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.

Mike Stoolmiller, J. Mark Eddy, and John Reid discovered that class observations don’t produce consistently reliable information– results they shared in the Journal of Consulting and Scientific Psychology article “Detecting and Describing Preventive Intervention Results in a Universal School-based Randomized Trial Targeting Delinquent and Violent Behavior.” They also noted that existing screening tools might focus just on surface area concerns or be too lengthy for instructors to finish.

And evaluations require some level of self-awareness and/or the willingness to inform the fact. In the context of violence and aggression, individuals– particularly children– may not acknowledge socioemotional problems as issues or may feel obliged to reduce more volatile sensations they’re experiencing, making it challenging for even trained specialists to identify issues.

So even as schools continue to see a year-over-year decline in deadly and nonfatal victimization, many kids at risk for aggressive habits still slip through the fractures– precisely at the time when the most impact can be made, inning accordance with Hill Walker, Elizabeth Ramsey, and Frank Gresham in “Avoiding Disruptive Habits.” Their post and other research studies have revealed that recognizing kids who may require intervention and helping them is most impactful previous to third grade, at which age kids can better establish necessary social abilities, including acting in a pro-social way instead of an aggressive one.

McCreery theorizes that specific kinds of video games can assist deal with a few of the spaces standard tools cannot bridge. Geared up with a moral-choice video game model for assessing and determining kids at danger for problem aggression, he stated, school-based professionals might track social habits across time in a way that is safe and controllable. Patterns of habits exposed through gameplay might assist offer a framework for intervention. And because the moral-choice model provides a brand-new understanding of the drivers and connections that occur for children when presented with tough social scenarios, a brand-new level of clarity could emerge that’s challenging to achieve entirely through observation and self-report.

“Our objective now is to create our own moral-choice game specifically designed to be a stealth assessment tool in carrying out mental evaluations,” McCreery said.

Despite criticism and sabotage, Amy Schumer keeps crafting wickedly brilliant satire

Amy Schumer is putting in the work. That’s not an appraisal of how hectic she is, though it could be; from the look of her CV, her days are loaded. Schumer acts in films (2015’s Trainwreck, which she also composed, 2017’s Snatched and this year’s I Feel Pretty); composes books (her 2016 memoir The Girl With The Lower Back Tattoo topped The New York Times best-seller list); has a hit sketch comedy television show (Funny Central’s Within Amy Schumer, presently on hiatus); acts on Broadway (her performance in Steve Martin’s Meteor Shower made her a Tony election); and maintains a strenuous stand-up touring schedule, one that brings her to the Cosmopolitan for a two-date mini residency August 10 and 11 (with two more programs on November 2 and 3).

However there’s keeping hectic, and after that there’s doing the work. And Amy Schumer, feminist, humorist and straight-out firebrand, fully devotes to her craft, even when it makes more work for her on the back end. The danger of saying whatever you need to state– about sexual harassment, about gender inequality, about body image– is that you’ll take flak for it, from within your fanbase and from without. Liberal audiences implicate Schumer of muddling the message at the expenditure of making filthy jokes (Los Angeles Times critic Lorraine Ali called Schumer’s career a “inebriated walk of pity toward world domination”), while misogynist trolls make every effort to shut her down entirely. (Most recently, they installed a project to sabotage Schumer’s latest Netflix unique with one-star reviews.)

Through all of it, Schumer keeps pushing forward. It’s tempting to think that being provocative is just a family characteristic (she’s a cousin of Senator Chuck Schumer), however if you’ve ever fallen down a bunny hole watching YouTube clips from Within Amy Schumer, it quickly ends up being evident she’s only playing the bad cards she’s been dealt and using them to bluff the haters. In one clip, she reacts to a sexting query of “What do you desire me to do to you?” with “Tell me I’m safe in my house.” In another, Schumer pleads with God (Paul Giamatti) to eliminate her herpes by destroying a village in Uzbekistan; the deal falls apart when God informs her she’ll need to stop drinking and call her mom regularly. And in a note-perfect parody of Sidney Lumet’s 1957 timeless 12 Angry Guys, an all-star cast, including Jeff Goldblum and Kumail Nanjiani, dispute whether Schumer is appealing enough to be on television.

Schumer’s comedy isn’t really for everybody, but everybody who values a truth-teller needs to appreciate it. “When a nude photo of yourself goes viral, the word you do not want individuals to use to explain it is ‘brave’,” she stated recently. Real enough. That word must explain exactly what Amy Schumer does onstage, right along with the words “humorous” and “real.”

AMY SCHUMER with Rachel Feinstein, Mia Jackson. August 10-11 & & November 2-3, 8 p.m., $59-$199. The Chelsea, 702-698-7475.

Household keeps in mind dad eliminated in east Las Vegas automobile wash shooting


A five-year-old Valley girl lost her daddy on Wednesday after he was shot and eliminated at an east Las Vegas car wash.

Cops later on discovered the suspects connected to Thomas “Tommy” Romero’s death. Officers tried to stop the automobile, but it became an authorities chase and shootout near Hollingsworth Elementary School near Bruce and Fremont Streets.

RELATED: Coroner recognizes suspect killed in officer-involved shooting in downtown Las Vegas

Romero’s mom Theresa said the family is having a difficult time coping.

“I cannot even discuss,” Theresa stated. “My body is so numb.”

Trying to find the best words has been tough. All this family can do is comfort each other and search for a way to tell a 5-year-old lady her father isn’t getting back.

“You rely on both moms and dads,” stated Jenifer Eastman, Tommy’s former sweetheart. “You’re like, ‘I want to be with daddy, I want to be with mommy,’ you constantly have that balance. For now, it’s simply me totally, but this will definitely impact her, since both Tommy and I had relationships with our daddies.”

Romero’s household said they don’t know why he was targeted.

“He left here and 7 O’clock in the morning, it took place at 7:30,” said Lorenza, Tommy’s grandmother. “I have no idea individuals.”

Rene Nunez was apprehended and the second suspect cops wanted, Fidel Miranda, was killed during the shootout.

As Romero’s family awaits more answers from police, they are preparing his funeral and raising money through GoFundMe. A number of regional organisations are also raising loan to help Romero’s household. You can make cash contributions in person at the following places:702 Mart; 1468 E Charleston BlvdFamily Food Mart I; 1102 Fremont Street Household Food Mart II; 3455 N Nellis Blvd D’s Smoke Shop; 3510 Bonanza Rd # 101

Copyright 2018 KVVU (KVVU Broadcasting Corporation). All rights reserved.

DJ Dave Fogg keeps the music coming from the cubicle to the workplace

Dave Fogg could be a history instructor, if the curriculum were a timeline of Las Vegas’ greatest bars.

Ra at Luxor. Rain at the Palms. Scotch Sky at Green Valley Ranch. Hit after hit after hit, and Fogg, one of the city’s longest tenured DJs, has actually had a hand in every one of them, though not always from behind the decks.

“About 20 percent [of my profession] is DJing, [and] 80 percent is talent purchasing,” he describes. “DJing, though, without a doubt, is most likely my preferred thing.”

Fogg, the talent purchaser for Drai’s and a fixture on the Drai’s Beachclub phase, is a rarity on the Strip: a nightlife executive who has actually experienced the club scene’s development dating back to the late ’80s, while still moonlighting– or daylighting, as it were– as a DJ.

When he’s not spinning, he’s presenting a few of dance music’s greatest names to Las Vegas. “It’s sort of like bragging rights,” Fogg states of bringing high-end, frequently undiscovered skill to the city.

At Ra, where Pleasuredome was born, he was the first to sign Armin van Buuren, Jeff Mills and Timo Maas. At the Palms, Fogg provided Diplo his first Vegas residency.

“Electronic music wasn’t even called EDM back then,” he states, assessing his profession in the middle of a busy Thursday at Drai’s Beachclub, where he’s still offering up-and-coming dance artists like TroyBoi and Anna Lunoe their very first major direct exposure to Vegas club crowds.

“A DJ moving into the talent purchaser lane is a very logical and smooth relocation, however it’s really distinct [in Las Vegas],” Fogg states. “I think most skill buyers are coming from the office environment; possibly they worked as a tour supervisor or an agent.”

The artist’s frame of mind, and the understanding and experience that features it, made Fogg the best candidate for the function. On days like this, he’s hustling behind the scenes, scheduling artists, arranging transportation and hotel accommodations and conceptualizing marketing concepts with groups of managers and promoters. On other days he’s onstage in the sunshine, opening for Henry Fong or another artist on Drai’s daytime lineup.

“I often need to ensure [artists] get in the place,” Fogg discusses. “However it’s really laid back here; if I’m opening for somebody I’ll text the guy and let them understand, ‘I’m opening for you, I can’t come grab you.'”

In such a competitive market, Fogg resists the urge to call names on his dream list, but he has already added some personal favorites this season, Marc Kinchen and Green Velvet amongst them.

“These are men that really influenced me being a DJ. This is 20 to 30 years that we’re discussing,” he says. “I love the chance to book someone like that, whose records I grew up playing. There’s certainly times where I can fanboy out, when it’s proper.”

Oprah keeps it unpresidential in address to California grads


Willy Sanjuan/Invision/ AP Oprah Winfrey speaks with graduates at USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the Shrine Auditorium on Friday, May 11, 2018, in Los Angeles.

Friday, Might 11, 2018|3:28 p.m.

LOS ANGELES– Oprah Winfrey paused prior to talking politics Friday as she stood in front of a crowd of graduates at the University of Southern California.

Then she decided it was safe.

” The reports from my last big speech have lastly died down,” she said to laughter and applause.

That speech at the Golden World Awards in January, loaded with fiery rhetoric on the fight for justice and the #MeToo motion, brought weeks of chatter about a presidential run for the 64-year-old media mogul and movie star that she has actually because dismissed.

” The misogyny has to stop!” she screamed at one comparable minute throughout Friday’s start address to graduates of USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

She also discussed electoral advocacy, weapon control and climate change, however kept it much more casual and apolitical than at the Golden Globes, primarily sticking to more basic inspiring fare.

She emphasized the value of civil service and asked the future journalists and public communicators to be warriors for truth in a time of widespread false information.

” The truth exonerates, and it convicts,” she said. “It decontaminates, and it galvanizes. The fact has actually always been and will constantly be our shield versus corruption, our shield against greed and despair. The reality is our saving grace.”

Winfrey had an answer for those who wondered why she was speaking at this smaller sized, satellite commencement event at the Shrine Auditorium instead of the school’s main event, where stars of her quality usually speak.

” I was going to be here anyhow,” she said.

Thando Dlomo, among Winfrey’s “daughter-girls,” whom Winfrey has actually mentored and sponsored because meeting her on a trip to South Africa when she the woman was in seventh grade, was in the crowd getting a master’s degree in journalism.

” I was looking for smart, brilliant, offering, durable, kind, open-hearted, women who had ‘it,’ that factor that indicates you keep going no matter what,” Winfrey stated. “She can be found in and recited a poem about her teacher, when she left I said ‘she’s got it.'”

Winfrey unwinded with some normal life tips, consisting of:

— “Eat a great breakfast. It really pays off.”

— “Put your phone down at the dinner table.”

— “Know that exactly what you tweet, post and Instagram today may be asked about in a task interview tomorrow or Twenty Years from tomorrow.”

— “Buy a quality mattress.”

— “Don’t low-cost out on your shoes.”

Using black dress and brilliant red hood, Winfrey led the graduates into the auditorium together with the school’s dean, Willow Bay, as the USC marching band played its fight songs.

Those on the dais with her consisted of Bay’s partner, Disney CEO Robert Iger, who in Winfrey’s existence had an uncommon minute where he wasn’t the richest individual in the space.

Labor commissioner keeps Nevada'' s base pay at $7.25.

Friday, May 11, 2018|11:45 a.m.

CARSON CITY, Nev.– The Nevada Labor Commissioner has decided to keep the minimum wage at $7.25 for workers with health take advantage of their employer and $8.25 for staff members without health benefits heading into the new fiscal year.

The Nevada Appeal reported Thursday that the minimum wage in the state has not increased because at least 2013, the first year that the state Labor Commission started publishing data on its website.

In Nevada, the base pay should be recalculated every year based on boosts in the federal minimum wage or by the cumulative increase in the cost of living if that’s higher.

The commissioner also decided to keep day-to-day rates for overtime the exact same considering that it depends on the base pay.

The fiscal year begins July 1.

President keeps hitting new lows

Friday, April 20, 2018|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s opinion section

It’s laughable that the male who consistently lied in his very first year as president wants us to believe he, not former FBI Director James Comey, is informing the truth. He has called Comey “a weak and untruthful slime ball” and a “low life.”

This man has actually deteriorated the workplace of the presidency. His Cabinet is a farce, a collection of lobbyists and Fox News rabble rousers.

Our standing in the world has actually dropped significantly, enabling China and Russia to grab larger functions in dictating the future. The White Home is no longer a source of American pride. It’s more of a sleazy shack where payoffs, greed, corruption and deceit reside. Sadly, Congressional Republicans, including our own Sen. Dean Heller, have let this guy go untreated.