contact)Saturday, March 17, 2018|2 a.m. Trevor Hayes Related news One of 2 regents pushing most vigorously for UNLV President Len Jessup’s ouster brushed off the notion that the board should be worried about fundraising at the university in spite of a mounting revolt by some of the school’s largest backers.
If regents’ actions require Jessup to leave, numerous mega-donors have stated they would rescind pledges that total up to about $39 million in donations to the UNLV School of Medicine and another $8 million for a basic scholarship endowment fund. These moves cast doubt on another $25 million in state-matching funds for the medical school. The pledges would go toward new building and construction, academic programs and scholarships.
Trevor Hayes, a regent who has been aggressive in pursuing Jessup’s elimination and exciting the ire of donors, stated fundraising isn’t part of the board’s duties.
“The board governs greater ed; we’re not fundraising events. It isn’t our responsibility,” said Hayes, who chairs the regents’ Service, Finance and Facilities Committee and is likewise on the board of directors of the UNLV Campus Enhancement Authority.
Meanwhile, Regent Sam Lieberman expressed certainty the cash would eventually return to the university.
Lieberman stated he was positive that Scott Roberts, UNLV’s president for philanthropy and alumni engagement, might “weather the storm and move forward.” Roberts might not be right away reached for comment.
“(Roberts) is extraordinary,” Lieberman stated. “And he will have the assistance he needs to get the donors.”
One of those donors sharply disagreed with Hayes and Lieberman.
The anonymous donor of a multimillion-dollar gift said Friday that the regents, as stewards of the state’s university system, need to be vitally concerned about the fallout that Jessup’s ouster might have on UNLV’s fundraising.
“Len created an immense quantity of support amongst the donor neighborhood,” the benefactor said. “I cannot speak for others, but for myself, we ‘d be at no contributions without Len there.”
The donor, who had actually contributed $8 million to a scholarship endowment fund, alerted the UNLV Foundation fundraising organization Friday early morning that he would rescind the present if Jessup were to resign or be fired.
Describing a faction of regents who have been publicly critical of Jessup and have mounted an effort to force him out, the donor stated UNLV advocates would remember them in their next election cycle. He suggested that moneying some donors may have guided towards UNLV might go rather to the regents’ election opponents.
“I believe these regents have to go,” he said. “I’m really concerned about people putting petty private concerns above the well-being of the university and of Southern Nevada, and I believe that’s exactly what’s going on here.”
On Wednesday, officials from the Engelstad Household Structure, which pledged $14 million for the building and construction of a medical school building, stated the gift was being withdrawn amidst unpredictability about Jessup’s future. That triggered a 2nd donor, who had provided $25 million and was considering using a second major donation, to also reevaluate.
An anonymous megadonor who provided a $25 million present towards building of the UNLV medical school building in 2016 responded madly to Hayes saying that a university’s fundraising wasn’t a regent’s responsibility. Given that regents are accountable for the overall well-being of Nevada’s institutions of higher education, she stated, Hayes and other regents ought to think about the implications of their actions on fundraising.
“Exactly what do you believe your duties entail?” she stated, intending her question at Hayes. “If fundraising isn’t your responsibility, is it your obligation to meddle and weaken what we’re doing?”
The donor, whose contribution for the medical school was matched by $25 million in state financing, has announced that she was reconsidering that present and future donations. If Jessup is forced out, she stated, she believed it would take a decade to restore trust amongst donors in the university.
“People do not just show back up on your doorstep,” she said. “They have to believe in what they’re purchasing.
“I believe these regents are delusional. They believe things are just going to plod along, which’s not what will happen.”
Beyond the considerable monetary damage to UNLV, if Jessup were to be dislodged or fired, some UNLV supporters and even regents believe the way this has unfolded might make it challenging for the university to discover an appropriate replacement.
Lieberman stated a certified candidate would have to think twice prior to signing on to lead the university. Jessup, in the third year of a five-year agreement, would be the fourth UNLV president since 2006 to be ushered out prior to completing his term.
Jessup’s accomplishments include supervising the registration of UNLV’s very first class of medical school students, helping cut an offer for the football team to share a stadium with the NFL’s Raiders, setting school fundraising records and discussing the 30,000 mark in student enrollment.
But Jessup has actually faced criticism from some regents and Chancellor Thom Reilly over financial and management conflicts, consisting of cost overruns from the 2016 presidential dispute at the Thomas & & Mack Center and low fundraising for the medical school building.
While a formal examination from Reilly happened in January, talked to regents said they hoped Jessup would stay in the position while a complete evaluation– carried out by a selected committee that interviews members of the community as well as school personnel– was finished and presented to the general public. That would come in between June and September.
“I’m a big fan of transparency,” Regent J.T. Moran said. “I would wish to go through a review procedure and give the board a chance to review all pertinent details so we can make a meaningful and educated decision.”
On the other hand, a declaration by Gov. Brian Sandoval made it sound as if decisions had actually already been made without any public meetings.
Sandoval, through spokeswoman Mari St. Martin, stated Thursday he had “great regard” for Jessup and wanted him well in “future endeavors.” St. Martin did not react when pressed about the possible future of the medical school, which Sandoval and the Nevada Legislature helped manage more $50 million in state funds to develop and open.
Ric Anderson added to this report.