Tag Archives: proposal

Proposal would bring back old motel facades in Fremont East District

Image

Mick Akers/ Las Vegas Sun A proposal requires bring back seven aging homes in the Fremont East District.

Monday, July 30, 2018|2 a.m.

Related content

Las Vegas authorities are wanting to breathe brand-new life to an aging area of downtown.

A part of Fremont Street, extending from Las Vegas Boulevard to 14th Street in the Fremont East District, is home to a number of aging motels in need of enhancements.

The city will ask for $762,000 from the Centennial Commission at its meeting today for the repair of motel facades and classic neon indications related to the homes.

The work will belong to Project Enchilada, the downtown master plan aimed at enhancing streetscapes, open space, retail and total enhancement in the area from Main Street to Eastern Opportunity and U.S. 95 to Charleston Boulevard. The job is a public-private collaboration.

Seven properties are listed on the city’s plans, with differing amounts of loan committed to each– Lucky Motel ($ 130,000), Fremont/AriNeva ($ 115,000) and Starview Motel ($ 110,000) are among the residential or commercial properties slated for six-figure overhauls.

The majority of the funding would go toward the initial refurbishing work, with $100,000 allocated toward a 10-year maintenance fund. The majority of the neon indications tied to the homes were constructed in the 1950s and refurbishing them is vital because they are the last remaining neon indications from their time, inning accordance with the proposition.

Each sign will be either reconditioned or rebuilt and put back on the traditionally precise position that they stemmed from.

The Downtown Task owns the homes, but isn’t really required to contribute toward the refurbishing, according to the demand. Nevertheless, they are required to pay for lighting the indications throughout night operations. If the project does not power and maintain the indications for a minimum of 10 years after they’re revamped, they must be contributed to the Neon Museum, inning accordance with the proposition.

If funds are approved, the neon lighting is slated to take place through July 2019.

Aside from neon indication refurbishing, the proposition incudes resolving vacant lots, updating landscaping and bring back power in the area.

Other organized components of Task Enchilada include: tactical retail plan for the location, producing parks, designation the location as an official parade path for the city, developing transport infrastructure– including bike paths and pedestrian pathways– and developing cultural experiences for the location with focus on brief distance locations.

Under Trump proposal, lawful immigrants might be inclined to avoid health advantages

Saturday, Might 12, 2018|2 a.m.

. The Trump administration is considering a policy change that might dissuade immigrants who are looking for long-term residency from using government-supported healthcare, a circumstance that is worrying some doctors, hospitals and patient supporters.

Under the proposed plan, a lawful immigrant holding a visa might be passed over for getting irreversible residency– a green card– if they use Medicaid, a subsidized Obamacare strategy, food stamps, tax credits or a list of other non-cash federal government advantages, inning accordance with a draft of the strategy published by The Washington Post. Even the use of such benefits by a child who is a U.S. citizen might

endanger a moms and dad’s chances of obtaining legal residency, inning accordance with the document. Health advocates state such a policy might scare a far more comprehensive group of immigrants who will prevent government-supported health coverage, creating public health problems that could show alarming. About 3 million people got green cards from 2014 through 2016, federal government records show. Immigrants with visas or those who may have no legal status but strategy to look for citizenship based upon a close household relationship would be affected.

“We are really concerned that this guideline, if settled, would have a substantial impact on health in this nation,” said Erin O’Malley, senior director of policy for America’s Vital Medical facilities, which talked about the strategy with Trump administration officials in mid-April.

O’Malley stated she fears that some visa holders and their households would stay away from getting regular treatment and turn to going to emergency clinic for treatment. Such a change would “weaken the stability of our healthcare facilities by producing uncompensated care expenses and creating sicker clients,” O’Malley said.

The policy change could force a mom to weigh the requirement for hospital inpatient take care of an ailing newborn versus losing her legal immigration status, stated Wendy Parmet, director of the Center for Health Policy and Law at Northeastern University.

“The administration, in the draft, discuss self-sufficiency,” she said. “But we don’t anticipate that of [children] who are U.S. people since they were born in this nation. “It’s incredibly hardhearted.”

Pushback has started despite the fact that the proposal is in the earliest stages of the rulemaking process.

Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, is sending personnel in mid-May to meet the White Home Workplace of Management and Budget, which is vetting the proposed guideline. Inslee sent a letter on April 24 advising OMB Director Mick Mulvaney to consider the influence on tax-paying, lawful immigrants.

“This will undoubtedly cause individuals across the U.S. going hungry, not accessing needed treatment, losing financial self-sufficiency, as well as ending up being homeless,” Inslee wrote.

The dripped draft said migration officials would count using one or more non-cash benefits by the candidate within 3 years as a “heavily weighed negative aspect” in deciding whether to grant permanent residency.

On March 29, the Department of Homeland Security sent out a version of the proposition to OMB, which reviews it for conflicts with existing law. Next, it will be released as a proposed rule that the general public can talk about before it’s settled.

Marilu Cabrera, public affairs officer with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Providers, declined to discuss whether the draft released by the Post mirrors exactly what the OMB is evaluating. Worry in immigrant neighborhoods currently weighs on physicians. Dr. Julie Linton, a spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics, deals with many Latino immigrant households at an outpatient clinic in Winston-Salem, N.C. She said one lady from Mexico, who had a newborn baby and three other kids, told Linton she hesitated to keep her household registered in the nutrition program for Females, Infants, and Children (WIC). “Is it safe to utilize WIC?” the woman asked her.

Linton said questions like that put pediatricians in a tough position. She said proof programs registering in WIC leads to better health results for kids. But exactly what if it likewise puts the household at risk of being split apart?

“It feels extremely frightening to have a household in front of me, and have a kid with so much capacity … and doubt the best ways to advise them” on whether to accept public benefits, Linton stated.

Maria Gomez, president of Mary’s Center, which runs health clinics in Washington, D.C., and Maryland, said she’s seeing 3 to 4 people a week who are not requesting WIC and are canceling their appointments to re-enroll in Medicaid.

The dripped draft of the proposal zeroes in on who is thought about a “public charge.” The concept emerged in immigration law in 1882, when Congress sought to bar immigrants who were “idiots, lunatics” or those most likely to end up being a burden on the government.

The notion of a “public charge” last emerged in 1999, when the migration service clarified the principle. Then and now, an immigrant thought about a “public charge” is inadmissible to the United States if the individual is most likely to count on the federal government for income, or lives in a government-funded long-term organization.

Yet the guideline released in 1999 clarified that legal homeowners were free to access non-cash benefits like Medicaid, food stamps and support for heating bills. “These advantages are typically offered to low-income working households to sustain and improve their ability to stay self-sufficient,” the standard states. The proposition, as drafted, would overthrow that.

Under such a policy, anybody who had recent or ongoing usage of a non-cash government benefit in the previous 36 months would likely be considered a “public charge,” and therefore inadmissible to the U.S. Using such benefits by a spouse, dependent moms and dad or child would likewise be taken into account.

Candidates who have “expensive health conditions” such as cancer, heart disease or “mental disorders” and had used a subsidized program would also get a “greatly weighed” unfavorable mark on their application, the draft states.

Marnobia Juarez, 48, fought cancer successfully and is hoping her hubby’s permit application is approved; she likewise imagines one day getting her own. She stated she never ever wanted to obtain public benefits up until she was detected with breast cancer in 2014. Since then, she has actually been treated at no charge under a program run by the state of Maryland.

“I’m alive thanks to this program,” stated Juarez, who is a health volunteer with an immigrant advocacy group. “You don’t have fun with life, and they are playing with life.”

The draft says immigrants could post a minimum $10,000 bond to assist conquer a determination that they are likely to be a “public charge.”

Such changes would affect individuals sponsored by a U.S. person member of the family, the majority of employment-based immigrants, diversity visa immigrants and “particular non-immigrants,” the draft states. In 2016, 1.2 million people got their legal permanent home status, or a green card. Of the total, 566,000 were instant relatives or spouses of U.S. people and 238,000 more were family-sponsored, Department of Homeland Security data show.

Some immigrants, such as refugees and asylees, would not be impacted. Nor would the proposed changes apply to undocumented immigrants.

“We’re talking about middle-class and working families,” stated Madison Hardee, senior policy lawyer with the Center for Law and Social Policy, which has actually organized a coalition to fight the proposal.”This could actually put moms and dads in an impossible situation in between looking for health support for their kids and getting an irreversible legal status in the U.S.”

The list of advantages consists of the Children’s Medical insurance Program, referred to as CHIP; non-emergency Medicaid; the Supplemental Nutrition Support Program, or food stamps; WIC; and short-term institutionalization at government expense and others. The dripped draft notes that foreign-born and native-born Americans utilize such programs at similar rates.

The draft says the proposal is implied to make sure that people looking for to “alter their nonimmigrant status are self-sufficient.” It notes “appropriate congressional policy statements,” including one that states “the availability of public advantages [ought to] not make up an incentive for immigration to the United States.”

KHN correspondent Emmarie Huetteman contributed to this report.

KHN’s protection of children’s health care issues is supported in part by the Heising-Simons Structure.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Structure which is not connected with Kaiser Permanente.

County discards proposal to let hair salons serve beer and wine

Tuesday, March 6, 2018|12:53 p.m.

Clark County commissioners today dropped a proposed regulation to let owners of hair salons and barbershops sell alcohol to clients, pointing out an absence of clearness and structure in the policies.

“There were simply a lot of questions about who would be offering the beverages, who would be marketing them, how they ‘d be distributed and numerous other problems,” Clark County Commission Chairman Steve Sisolak stated. “It simply got to be too much.”

If passed, the regulation, initially talked about at a Feb. 21 meeting, would have allowed clients to buy beer and wine along with their hairstyles.

Commissioner Lawrence Weekly said business owners report that customers frequently ask if they offer drinks like salons and barbershops in some other places.

7 states have authorized serving alcohol at beauty parlors, hair salons and health clubs, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Nevada is not one of them.

Housing proposal for old Badlands golf course is worthy of to be flushed

Image

Christopher DeVargas A look at the old Badlands Golf Course, which beings in a natural ravine surrounded by the Queensridge master-planned neighborhood, Monday, Feb. 19, 2018.

Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2018|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s viewpoint section

Developer Yohan Lowie has created a plan for the former Badlands Golf Course that is every bit as modern-day and ingenious as the flying maker, the landline telephone and motion pictures.

Lowie is asking the Las Vegas City board to allow the homes of be built with sewage-disposal tanks on the site.

That’s right, septic tanks.

In a bundled part of the Las Vegas Valley.

In 2018.

This is patently absurd, and the council needs to waste no time at all in declining the proposal, which is flawed for a variety of factors in addition to the waste treatment concern. Lowie’s strategy just plain stinks– potentially quite actually, needs to it in some way pass.

Remember that state law typically needs residential or commercial properties located within 400 feet of a community hygienic sewer line to hook into that line. In this case, however, the advancement websites in question are blocked from the sewer line by a gain access to road controlled by the property owners association for homeowner on the previous course. The HOA has actually refused to provide Lowie access to the roadway to build sewer connections to the websites he’s seeking to establish.

City Councilman Steve Seroka, in an interview with the Sun’s Yvonne Gonzalez, stated locals wanted to work through the logjams on the concern to make sure that any improvements on the golf course acreage wouldn’t even more injure their property worths or deteriorate their lifestyle. Seroka said Lowie had actually largely brought his present issues on himself.

“The only thing that prevents him from gravity-feeding the sewer system (therefore connecting to the sewer line) is his inability to simply speak to the existing property owners association and residents,” Seroka stated. “If we might resolve that, not only would the septic requirement go away, the contention about the whole issue would go away. So actually this comes down to a dialogue in between the designer and the existing residents.”

Whether that can happen after years of unsightly court battles and contentious city board conferences is unclear, but the council would be absurd to authorize the new proposition. Although Lowie contends the property can be established based upon an old zoning rule, his opponents state master plans restrict houses from being developed there. In addition, they compete that the location is in a floodplain which building houses and roads on the golf course acreage would entail spending countless dollars on infrastructure to channel stormwater through the community.

Last month, neighbors scored a victory through a court ruling stating the city board had overstepped its authority and violated the law in permitting a different plan for condo development to progress.

Now comes Lowie with his septic tank strategy, which is a harmful, regressionist concept.

For Las Vegas to continue to emerge as a modern, progressive neighborhood to developers and for people wanting to buy homes here, the project has to be rejected. Even better would be for Lowie to withdraw it and either return to the drawing board or attempt to work with the property owners.

PUC at odds on Switch after last-minute proposal is provided

Image

Courtesy of Switch

Las Vegas-based information center Switch wish to leave the energy grid and produce its own power.

Tuesday, June 9, 2015|10:50 p.m.

. The three-member Public Utilities Commission heads into a controversial vote on Wednesday with clashing opinions and one swing vote that will eventually decide if a Las Vegas tech business can purchase and produce power without NV Energy, the state’s dominant power business.

The commission will vote on whether Change, which houses information for business like eBay and Sony, can leave its existing power buying contracts with the energy. Change is one of NV Energy’s greatest clients and at the center of a push by numerous gambling establishments who recently applied to sever ties with the utility. The last order will certainly set the phase for what Wynn Resorts, Las Vegas Sands and MGM Resorts International can expect from the PUC and its regulatory operations personnel– which is independent from the commissioners– throughout their application treatments and vote in the coming months.

The chairwoman of the commission, Aliana Burtenshaw, issued a draft order on Monday that denied Change’s exit application, saying it was not in the public’s interest.

Commissioner Rebecca Wagner on Tuesday issued a rebuttal, asking for an adjustment to the draft that would allow Change to leave as long as it paid a $27 million exit cost.

Commissioner David Noble will certainly now be the prominent swing vote, potentially passing Burtenshaw’s order, embracing Wagner’s change or finding another option in the Eleventh Hour.

The draft order and recommended modifications follow an eight-month application procedure where PUC regulative operations personnel, the utility and others investigated the prospective impacts of a Change exit on consumers and the power company. All celebrations calculated exit costs to find a fair value that would not trigger rates for other NV Energy customers to increase. Switch recommended $18 million. NV Energy made one idea that neared $60 million. The PUC regulative operations staff suggested $27 million.

Wagner’s proposal says the exit cost recommended by the PUC regulative operations personnel strikes a “affordable balance amongst the interests detailed in the [statute]”

“Personnel conducted comprehensive analysis to conclude that an effect of roughly $27 million is sensible,” she composed.

On the other hand, Burtenshaw’s draft order recommended the three-year forecasting design to approximate exit fees– which the commission utilized in previous exit applications for mining companies and other gambling establishments– is obsoleted for existing conditions in the state and might not give the best estimates to safeguard ratepayers who will certainly continue to be with the utility. 2 mining business– Barrick and Newmont– were the only companies to exit.

Throughout the case, regulators or their personnel never ever pointed out potential problems the forecasting design might posture.

Wagner’s order also suggests Burtenshaw’s order does not supply “a sensible path forward” for Switch or any other entity wishing to exercise its rights under the law, which initially entered effect in 2001.

Wagner recommended that the PUC needs to examine how it examines exit charges and whether the law ought to alter as currently written.

The statute, referred to NRS 704b, permits business to cut ties with the energy if they take in more than 1 megawatt of power each year, pay an exit cost and get PUC approval. (A Super Walmart consumes about three-quarters of a megawatt annually. Change uses 34.)

The law was an effort to offer massive power consumers with more options for buying and producing power. Lawmakers passed it during the California energy crisis spurred by Enron, the defunct energy company that controlled power markets in Western states to improperly control the cost and availability of electrical energy.

The PUC will certainly start the Switch case at 9:30 am Wednesday.

Winning proposal for lunch with Warren Buffett tops $2.3 million

Image

Nati Harnik/ AP

In this Nov. 14, 2011, photo, billionaire financier Warren Buffett speaks in Omaha, Neb., at an event to raise money for the Girls Inc. charity company.

Friday, June 5, 2015|9:12 p.m.

OMAHA, Neb.– A Chinese business that develops online video games bid more than $2.3 million Friday to win a private lunch with Warren Buffett.

Beijing-based Dalian Zeus Home entertainment Co. bid $2,345,678 to win the online auction. The Glide Foundation uses the auction continues to help the bad and homeless in San Francisco.

The 2015 quote was still well listed below the 2012 winning proposal of $3,456,789– the most expensive charity item ever sold on eBay. In 2013’s winning quote was $2,166,766.

Many people want Buffett’s recommendations because the 84-year-old is revered as a financier and benefactor. Buffett is chairman and president of Berkshire Hathaway, and more than 40,000 individuals attended the company’s yearly meeting in Might to pay attention to Buffett response questions.

Over the previous 15 years, the lunch auction has raised $17.9 million for Glide, which supplies meals, healthcare, job training, recovery and housing support to the bad and homeless. The not-for-profit depends on the event to generate part of its roughly $18 million yearly budget plan.

Buffett has said the lunches generally last a minimum of 3 hours and cover a variety of topics. The only topic off-limits is what Buffett plans to invest in next.

“Every year, it’s an interesting experience for me,” Buffett said. “I have actually fulfilled a great deal of fantastic people in connection with it. Made brand-new buddies. Worked with an individual. Had a lot of great steaks, so I can’t whine.”

One previous winner, Ted Weschler, got a job offer after investing nearly $5.3 million to win the 2010 and 2011 auctions. Weschler now works as an investment manager for Berkshire and gets to chat with Buffett regularly.

The winners of the lunch auction often dine at Smith & & Wollensky steakhouse in New York City, which donates a minimum of $10,000 to Slide each year to host the lunch.

However a few of the previous winners who wished to remain confidential opted to dine at one of Buffett’s favorite Omaha, Nebraska, steakhouses.

No matter the place, the winner can raise to 7 friends.

Associated Press writer Amy Shafer in Chicago contributed to this report.