Tag Archives: restriction

Nevada church states school restriction on religious leaflets illegal

Friday, Dec. 1, 2017|2:41 p.m.

RENO– An evangelical Christian church in Nevada says its First Modification rights are being violated by a rural school district’s restriction on promotional leaflets the church wishes to distribute at a school community program together with other charitable companies.

Legal Representatives for Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley sent out a letter to the Lyon County School District today demanding equal access to its community flyer circulation program.

Under the title of “Unconstitutional Censorship of Religious Viewpoints,” they suggest the district east of Reno could deal with a suit if they fail to change existing policy.

The policy embraced in July states the district recognizes that many outside organizations “add to the education and positive development of trainees and their households,” and therefore the district may assist those groups in dispersing leaflets and announcements. But it particularly restricts flyers that are “planned to promote a partisan political cause/candidate, promote a spiritual opinion/belief, are propagandistic or proselytizing.”

District authorities maintain the policy is legal. They said in a statement offered to The Associated Press on Friday they were caught by surprise by the criticism and have provided to consult with church authorities to discuss their issues.

The church in Dayton 15 miles northeast of Carson City is being represented by a private law office and the First Liberty Institute, a Texas-based public interest law firm that describes itself as the largest legal organization in the nation devoted solely to defending religious flexibilities.

Amber Williams, a private Las Vegas-based attorney, stated in the Nov. 28 letter that the district refused to disperse flyers about the church’s “Harvest Celebration” in late October and an “Outside Adventures” program involving “outside activities and Christian mentorship.”

The district has dispersed leaflets about similar activities involving outdoor programs, sports leagues, and Halloween parties from a variety of regional neighborhood groups, including Boys and Ladies Clubs, Williams composed.

But district officials refused to enable the church’s leaflets unless they got rid of pictures of a cross and Bible quotes and changed expressions such as “Christ-centered discipleship/mentoring program” to “mentoring program,” she stated.

The U.S. Supreme Court has actually ruled that “school employees, like all government stars, are needed to remain neutral with regard to personal spiritual speech,” Williams composed. Because the district disperses “considerably similar leaflets from a secular point of view,” she said the school needs to deal with leaflets “from a religious point of view” in the exact same way.

“They may not single out a church’s flyers for censorship, and they may not force a church to scrub the leaflets of any spiritual language,” included Stephanie Taub, a lawyer for Very first Liberty. “That is hostility towards religion.”

District spokeswoman Erika Garcia said in a declaration emailed to AP that the district “has actually always enjoyed a great relationship with this church.”

To name a few things, the district allows the church to host an after-school program at Dayton Elementary School and has offered volunteers to assist establish tables at family nights “while using t-shirts with church recognizing logo designs,” she stated.

An assistant pastor for Calvary Chapel attended one of the 2 public meetings on the policy adopted on July 25, but “did not comment or supply any input,” she said.

Garcia said they wish to consult with church leaders and their lawyers to describe “our view as to why the policy is legal and in compliance with all constitutional requirements and, more notably, to deal with any issues they might have.”

Federal judge blocks Texas restriction of common abortion procedure

Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2017|3:44 p.m.

AUSTIN, Texas– A federal judge on Wednesday obstructed a new Texas law looking for to prohibit a commonly utilized abortion technique, the current in a string of court defeats to the Legislature’s attempts to make getting an abortion as tough as possible in America’s second most-populous state.

Austin-based U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel extended forever a momentary ban he ‘d formerly provided prior to the law was set to work Sept. 1. That overturns– at least for now– a law that Republican politician Gov. Greg Abbott checked in June banning a second-trimester abortion procedure called dilation and evacuation. Texas is set to appeal, but federal courts in a minimum of 4 other states already had blocked comparable laws.

Yeakel’s ruling followed a trial early this fall where the judge heard arguments from Texas, which protected the law, and from abortion rights groups who argue it unconstitutionally burdens females seeking abortions. Texas Chief Law Officer Ken Paxton submitted an instant notification of attract the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

“A five-day trial in district court allowed us to build a record like no other in exposing the truth about the barbaric practice of dismemberment abortions. We aspire to provide that comprehensive record before the 5th Circuit. No simply society should endure the tearing of living human beings to pieces,” Paxton stated in a declaration.

Federal judges have actually already ruled versus past Texas efforts to change the disposal of fetal remains and reject Medicaid moneying to abortion supplier Planned Parenthood over videos secretly recorded by an anti-abortion group. In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted most of a sweeping, anti-abortion law authorized in Texas in 2013 which assisted require the closure of majority of the state’s abortion centers.

Texas for many years authorized tight abortion constraints arguing that they would safeguard the lives of pregnant women. After the Supreme Court defeat, the Legislature this session started backing proposals aimed at safeguarding fetuses, but constantly with top Republicans’ stated goal of decreasing the variety of abortions carried out in their state to as close to no as possible.

The Texas law Yeakel suspended utilizes the non-medical term “dismemberment abortion” to describe a treatment where forceps and other instruments are used to eliminate the fetus from the womb. Paxton’s workplace had argued that “prohibiting this inhumane treatment does not impose any substantial health dangers or problems on females” while pointing out alternative treatments that abortion providers state are less safe and reliable.

However, in a 27-page viewpoint, Yeakel wrote that the Supreme Court had already weight in on second-trimester abortions twice. In both cases, justices held that “the law enforced an excessive problem on a female seeking a pre-fetal-viability abortion,” he wrote.

The power to choose to have an abortion “is her right,” Yeakel wrote, including that the right over the interest of the fetus prior to it ends up being practical “is self-evident.”

“Here the state’s interest should give way to the female’s right,” Yeakel composed.

Federal courts previously obstructed dilation and evacuation restrictions in Alabama, Kansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma. Texas presently has around 20 abortion centers, down from 41 in 2012.

Trump travel restriction ends Sunday; new limitations expected

Image

Brynn Anderson/ AP President Donald Trump speaks at a project rally in support of Sen. Luther Strange, Friday, Sept. 22, 2017, in Huntsville, Ala.

Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017|2:47 p.m.

WASHINGTON– President Donald Trump is expected to announce brand-new constraints on travel to the United States as his restriction on visitors from 6 Muslim-majority nations expires Sunday, 90 days after it went into impact.

The Department of Homeland Security has advised the president sign off on brand-new, more targeted constraints on foreign nationals from countries it says choose not to share info with the U.S. or have not taken essential security safety measures.

Trump appeared to preview his intents as he spoke with press reporters on the tarmac of a New Jersey airport Sunday, stating: “the tougher the much better.”

Authorities haven’t stated which– or the number of– nations will be impacted by the new limitations, which might work as soon as Sunday.

“The acting secretary has actually advised actions that are tough which are customized, including limitations and improved screening for particular nations,” said Miles Taylor, therapist to acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke.

The present restriction bars residents of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen who lack a “reputable claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States” from getting in the U.S.

Unlike Trump’s first travel ban, which stimulated chaos at airports across the country and a flurry of legal obstacles, authorities stated they have actually been working for months on the brand-new guidelines, in cooperation with various companies and in conversation with foreign federal governments.

The suggestions are based on a brand-new baseline developed by DHS that includes aspects such as whether nations problem electronic passports with biometric information and share information about tourists’ terror-related and criminal histories. The United States then shared those benchmarks with every country on the planet and gave them 50 days to comply.

The people of countries that refused might now face travel restrictions and more strict screening procedures that would last forever, up until their governments complied.

Trump last week required a “harder” travel ban after a bomb partially blew up on a London subway.

“The travel ban into the United States need to be far larger, harder and more specific-but stupidly, that would not be politically correct!” he tweeted.

Critics have implicated Trump of overstepping his authority and breaking the U.S. Constitution’s securities versus religious bias. Trump had called for a “overall and total shutdown of Muslims getting in the United States” during his campaign.

Justices enable Trump administration restriction on most refugees

Tuesday, Sept. 12, 2017|3:33 p.m.

WASHINGTON– The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to preserve its restrictive policy on refugees.

The justices on Tuesday accepted an administration demand to obstruct a lower court judgment that would have alleviated the refugee ban and permitted as much as 24,000 refugees to enter the nation before the end of October.

The order was not the court’s last word on the travel policy that Trump initially presented in January. The justices are scheduled to hear arguments on Oct. 10 on the legality of the restrictions on travelers from 6 primarily Muslim nations and refugees throughout the world.

It’s uncertain, though, exactly what will be left for the court to choose. The 90-day travel ban lapses in late September and the 120-day refugee restriction will expire a month later.