Tag Archives: streaming

In Las Vegas, industry leader states theaters will endure rise of streaming websites

Wednesday, April 25, 2018|2 a.m.

Two film market leaders told theater owners Tuesday that are optimistic about the motion picture and theatrical exhibition business in spite of concerns about declining participation and competition from streaming services.

New Motion Picture Association of America chief Charles Rivkin and John Fithian, the president and CEO of the National Association of Theater Owners, provided a state of the industry speech at CinemaCon in Las Vegas, saying the strength of the movies being released will determine box-office sales.

“Our business increases or falls on the motion pictures in our cinemas,” Fithian stated.

CinemaCon is a yearly event of theater owners and exhibitors, throughout which they get an appearance upcoming movies from major Hollywood studios and a preview of some of the latest and biggest in theatrical technologies as well as concession alternatives.

Rivkin, who just recently took over the position at the MPAA from Christopher Dodd, stated that 263 million individuals went to the films a minimum of when in North America in 2017– more than three quarters of the North American population. He kept in mind that while package office was a little below the record in 2016, it was on par with the 2015 record. He says he believes the marketplace will always move between record-high or near record years.

He also stressed that he would continue to fight to protect intellectual property with anti-piracy efforts. Film and television account for $16.5 billion in exports, he stated, which the industry supports 2.1 million tasks and $139 billion in salaries every year.

Rivkin was previously the president and CEO of The Jim Henson Company and also acted as the U.S. Ambassador to France and as Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Organisation Affairs.

“Let’s always provide on the pledge of our imaginative industry: high quality stories that talk to the hopes and dreams of our audience, and will continue to do so for generations to come,” Rivkin stated.

Fithian likewise applauded filmmakers and suppliers for “taking significant actions to attain more diversity and favorable representation on the big screen,” which he says their consumers are “requiring.”

“We are optimistic that 2017 and 2018 will one day be considered as a turning point on this front,” Fithian stated.

Fithian likewise talked to some of the major worries of the motion picture organisation and stated that younger audiences are still enthusiastic spectators. Inning accordance with comScore, moviegoers ages 18-44 constituted 63% of the total ticket office in 2017_up from 61% in 2016. Fithian said that interruption, whether it’s streaming or shortened periods where films are program exclusively in theaters, will not eliminate the theatrical business.

He questioned if “Black Panther,”” Go out “or” Wonder Female “would have been cultural landmarks had they gone straight to streaming.

“I have actually worked with (theater owners) for 26 years. I can’t begin to tell you how frequently reporters have asked me if the movie theater industry is dying. Every decline in admissions suggests secular decrease, every development or enhancement is meant to ‘conserve’ the theater service,” he said. “There has been a great deal of hype about the next ‘disturbance,'” he stated, listing off improvements varying from VHS to the advent of movies launching in theaters and home services the same day. “Yet we never pass away but stay a strong organisation in the face of interruption everywhere else in the home entertainment landscape.”

Disney streaming service to obtain '' Star Wars ' and Marvel


Marvel’s Avengers: Age Of Ultron. L to R: Captain America/Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) and Thor (Chris Hemsworth). Ph: Jay Maidment. Marvel 2015

Thursday, Sept. 7, 2017|6:27 p.m.

NEW YORK– “Star Wars” and the Marvel comic-book motion pictures will sign up with Disney’s upcoming streaming service, potentially providing it wider appeal beyond households with young children.

The Disney service will be the only place to stream those movies as needed in the United States as part of a regular monthly membership. (So, not on Netflix.)

A cost hasn’t been revealed yet. The service is anticipated in late 2019 after Disney’s existing handle Netflix ends.

Previously Disney revealed the addition of simply Disney and Pixar films and Disney TELEVISION shows. Adding the “Star Wars” and Marvel movies could make the brand-new service attracting teens and adults. The Marvel movies include the “Avengers” and “Guardians of the Galaxy” franchises.

The service will likewise have initial Disney films, TV series and shorts. Disney CEO Bob Iger stated thousands of TV episodes and hundreds of movies will be readily available, though shows from Disney’s ABC network aren’t pertaining to the service.

Disney said last month that it was thinking about moving “Star Wars” and Marvel to the brand-new service, however a choice wasn’t revealed till Thursday.

Disney did not say whether all the “Star Wars” films going back to the 1977 would be offered on the service, or all the movies in the Marvel universe. A spokesman had no immediate comment. Netflix also has a TELEVISION series based on Marvel characters, and Netflix said Thursday that relationship continues. Similar to the Disney and Pixar movies, Marvel and “Star Wars” motion pictures that play in theaters in 2018 will be on Netflix for U.S. viewers, and some films will be available into 2020.

Disney’s offering is one of numerous online film and TV choices coming from home entertainment and tech companies, with more in the works. Disney, for instance, is likewise launching an ESPN sports streaming service early next year. It won’t replicate what’s on ESPN, in the meantime, so it’s expected to be rather specific niche.

The company’s shares slid $4.05, or 4 percent, to $97.46 in Thursday afternoon trading. Financiers might have sold because Iger stated revenues per share for this fiscal year will resemble the level for the year that ended on Oct. 1, 2016. Wall Street analysts had forecasted growth.

Q+A: Streaming and the future of consuming sports material

Tuesday, Might 30, 2017|2 a.m.

Mike Kelley, Grabyo's president of the Americas

Mike Kelley, Grabyo’s president of the Americas Seeing sports no longer implies making an appointment with your TELEVISION and couch when you get home from work.

As much material as you desire can be streamed on any number of devices no matter where you are. The nature of sports broadcasting and content usage changes quickly, and Mike Kelley of Grabyo stands at the fore of that vibrant landscape.

As president of the Americas for the business, which develops social video production and publishing tools, Kelley works out handle the English Premier League, La Liga, Wimbledon and The Rugby Channel, to name a few sports partners. Kelley previously led TELEVISION company development and method for NeuLion, where he dealt with the NFL, NBA, NHL, UFC, MLS and Univision to protect broadcasting/streaming offers.

Kelley consulted with the Sun about the future of sports material. Excerpts from the interview follow:

The NFL recently signed a offer to stream some of its games by means of Amazon Prime. Exactly what’s the capacity for an offer like that?

There’s a lot of potential on many fronts. One is, the NFL did a Twitter offer last year where the content was open and totally free like a broadcast deal in tv since broadcast channels are complimentary. Now they have actually moved to a more standard pay design, where you’re going to have to be a Prime subscriber on Amazon to see this content. It’s a digital offer, but it’s somewhat much like a traditional offer they may made with a pay-TV company.

It’s fascinating to see if that equates into digital and whether people want to pay to be a Prime member to obtain the NFL content. The NFL is certainly a fantastic use case due to the fact that it’s the No. 1 sports league that everybody wants to view, at least in the United States. I believe they will see some uplift from that.

There’s a marketing component to that, however it’s minimal– they don’t have a lot of ads to sell because they’re going to be passing through a few of the CBS and NBC advertisements. That’s the first venture for Amazon into the advertising video game, so it’s going to be interesting to see how they made with that.

The 3rd component is how they utilize their commerce platform around the NFL material. Certainly there’s all kinds of commerce opportunities: tickets, merchandise, offering other media content around the NFL video games. I remained in the interactive TELEVISION company for years, and everybody was discussing ways to bring commerce to the Television Set through your set-top box. That didn’t truly concern fruition.

Exactly what’s happening now is you’re bringing media and material to a commerce platform through Amazon. So it’s sort of flipped on its head a little bit.

How does marketing change as content moves to digital vs. broadcast?

It belongs to the evolving nature of conversations between the sports rights holder and their broadcast partner, whether that be a standard broadcast partner or a digital partner, and the marketer. It’s still evolving. Ideally, the content owner and their digital partner like an Amazon want to see the capability to replace broadcast ads and sell the advertising independently since in their view, it’s a various platform and a various audience than is on broadcast.

Obviously the big broadcasters out there, the NBC and CBS of the world, will battle that as long as they can. But even they are selling different digital plans and broadcast bundles for the Olympics and NFL. The concept is, an impression is an impression, and you wish to offer that. You do not wish to just pass it through on digital.

Facebook is a terrific partner. Other partners we’ve dealt with like Periscope and YouTube are all attempting to develop the digital marketing environment. It’s all really nascent at this phase. There’s a lot of trial and tests of things.

You have to construct sufficient case studies and use cases to present to the audience. You can picture maybe a year from now some of those formats belonging of the upfronts in New York with the huge ad agencies.

How can regional sports networks leverage the power of digital to assist their item?

It’s an intriguing concern. Exactly what’s taking place on social media now in regards to live broadcasts is a huge part of the development of broadcast in general, and for the local guys as well. You have fans of NHL teams or the Raiders across the country, so using social and digital to reach those fans will be actually fascinating.

At the end of the day, it’s partly a rights video game. Every team prefers to have a regional rights handle a local network however maybe a Facebook or a Twitter or a YouTube becomes that regional broadcaster if they wished to be, or at least play because area. They can geotarget all their material delivery. If you wish to do a target by POSTAL CODE, so you only deliver it on social media to particular ZIP codes, you can do that.

So you have these social platforms contending for big nationwide or global rights deals, but you can also contend on a local level since they can geotarget and distribute a lot cheaper than a traditional broadcast system.

I use this example all the time– Genuine Madrid has a channel called Genuine Madrid TV. That was sitting on satellite TELEVISION suffering. Not a great deal of individuals watched it day in and day out. They decided to restore it through social media. They began simply with highlights and clips from it, but then they started running their linear channel through Grabyo 24/7, so they could go cope with the channel on Facebook and other platforms whenever they wanted to.

Suddenly, with their tens of millions of followers and the way individuals might easily discover material in their news feed, they were getting numerous thousands of viewers for each piece of content. And they can then generate income from that with sponsors. You can see where some these sports properties and groups will do that.

Deals make sure money keeps streaming to uncertain Prince estate


Carlos Gonzalez/ Star Tribune by means of AP

In this April 21, 2016 file picture, a rainbow appears over Paisley Park near a memorial for Prince, in Chanhassen, Minn. Court filings in Prince’s estate show that a special administrator, and most likely Prince’s brother or sisters, aspire to explore the lucrative capacity of making a traveler destination out of his Paisley Park house and studio complex.

Saturday, April 15, 2017|8:17 a.m.

MINNEAPOLIS– A year after Prince died of an accidental drug overdose, his Paisley Park studio complex and house is now a museum and performance place. Fans can now stream the majority of his classic albums, and a remastered “Purple Rain” album is due out in June together with two albums of unreleased music and 2 show movies from his vault.

Prince left no known will and had no recognized children when he died last April 21, and the judge supervising Prince’s estate has yet to officially state 6 of his siblings as its successors. Nevertheless, those running the estate have actually taken steps to preserve his musical tradition and keep the money coming in. Here’s a look at where things stand:


The worth of the music deals hasn’t been revealed, and essential financial information in large court filings is sealed.

Universal Music Group was a big winner, reaching significant offers that offered it the licensing rights to Prince’s vault of unreleased music and his independently tape-recorded albums, publishing rights and merchandising rights.

Under related offers, Prince’s music is now offered from significant streaming services including Spotify, Apple Music, Pandora, Amazon Music and iHeartRadio.

However a suit stays pending against Jay Z’s Roc Country and the Tidal streaming service over alleged copyright violations. Tidal claims Prince gave it the unique right to stream his albums, including his Warner Bros. catalog. Estate attorneys state he offered Tidal minimal rights to only one album, 2015’s “Struck N Run: Phase 1.”


Paisley Park, which is run by the business that runs Elvis Presley’s Graceland, opened for public trips in October. Visitors can see the studios and soundstage where Prince worked and pay their respects at the Paisley Park-shaped urn that holds his ashes. It also hosts dance celebrations and movie and video provings on Friday and Saturday nights.

Close to 100,000 people from all over the world have actually taken the tour, although winter was anticipated to be the sluggish season, said Joel Weinshanker, handling partner of PPark Management, who has a comparable role with Graceland. He wouldn’t release revenue figures.

Weinshanker said he expects several hundred thousand visitors in the first full year of operations, which he stated would make it the No. 2 museum committed to an entertainer behind Graceland.

He said the majority of the cash is approaching maintaining the building, which he said remained in “serious disrepair” when Prince died, and towards securing its contents. He stated the cooling and heating system had to be changed, some rooms where videos were stored had current water damage, and important custom-designed attires were poorly saved on wire hangers.

From April 20-23, Paisley Park will mark the anniversary of Prince’s death with Celebration 2017, which will include shows and other programs. Acts scheduled to appear consist of The Transformation, Morris Day and the Time, New Power Generation, Liv Warfield and Shelby J., with members of 3RDEYEGIRL, the band Prince was nurturing when he died. Weinshanker said it will draw visitors from 28 countries.


Disallowing any surprises, 6 Prince brother or sisters will get equal shares of his estate, which court filings have actually recommended deserves around $200 million. Federal and estate taxes are expected to take in nearly half of that.

Judge Kevin Eide composed last month that he was “reasonably particular” he’ll ultimately state the beneficiaries to be Prince’s sibling, Tyka Nelson, and his half-siblings Sharon Nelson, Norrine Nelson, John R. Nelson, Omarr Baker and Alfred Jackson.

After Prince died, more than 45 individuals filed claims claiming to be his wife, children, brother or sisters or other loved ones. They have actually all been turned down, but Eide has stated he’ll wait on some appeals to run their course prior to making a final ruling, which could take several months or more. The six presumptive beneficiaries have asked him to speed things up. A hearing on that request is set for May 10.


With so much loan at stake, there’s been some infighting. Court files and testament show that the siblings disagreed over who must manage the estate, eventually picking Comerica Bank & & Trust as the administrator.

The older half-siblings– Norrine, Sharon, John and Alfred– likewise wanted a co-executor, previous Prince lawyer L. Londell McMillan, who was a key figure in the offers for generating income from Prince’s home entertainment assets.

But Tyka and Omarr opposed McMillan, questioning his fitness to serve and accusing him of mismanaging a family homage concert last October. They wanted CNN analyst Van Jones, who advised Prince on philanthropy. Mentioning the siblings’ failure to concur, the judge put Comerica in sole control.

McMillan continues to advise Norrine, Sharon and John, though a current filing shows Jackson has actually broken with him. Legal representatives for Omarr and Tyka have subpoenaed a potentially substantial volume of files from McMillan. The judge will think about a movement to quash that subpoena at the May 10 hearing.

Sharon, on the other hand, declared last month that Comerica was being “dictatorial and bullish.” Comerica denied any rude, violent or hostile conduct, however stated the beneficiaries don’t get to vote on how it runs the estate.