Tag Archives: trump

West Hollywood passes resolution to remove Trump’s star from Walk of Popularity

This before and after picture shows the damage to President Trump's Hollywood Walk of Fame star, which was destroyed with a pickax on July 25, 2018. (Getty Images)
< img alt =" This before and after photo shows the damage to President Trump's Hollywood Walk of Fame star, which was damaged with a pickax on July 25, 2018. (Getty Images)"

title =” This before and after photo shows the damage to President Trump’s Hollywood Walk of Popularity star, which was destroyed with a pickax on July 25, 2018. (Getty Images)” border =” 0″ src =” http://MEREDITH.images.worldnow.com/images/17360110_G.png?auto=webp&disable=upscale&width=800&lastEditedDate=20180807071241″ width=”180″/ > This before and after picture shows the damage to President Trump’s Hollywood Stroll of Fame star, which was

ruined with a pickax on July 25, 2018. (Getty Images). (Meredith/AP)– The West Hollywood City Council unanimously authorized a resolution Monday night looking for to get rid of President Trump’s star from the Hollywood Stroll of Fame. The resolution prompts the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce and the Los Angeles City board to permanently get rid of Trump’s star “due to his troubling treatment of females and other actions that do not fulfill the shared values of the City of West Hollywood, the region, state, and country.”

However, chamber president Leron Gubler informs the Los Angeles Times the chamber has never ever removed a star due to the fact that it’s considered part of the walk’s “historic fabric.”

Trump got the star in 2007 for his work producing the Miss America pageant prior to starring in the TELEVISION truth show “The Apprentice.”

Since then, the street plaque has been defaced and vandalized numerous times, with the most recent event happening just last month. Austin Clay, 24, was charged Monday after allegedly ruining the star with a pickax on July 25. He might confront three years in prison if founded guilty.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Copyright 2018 Meredith Corporation. All rights booked.

Trump tape exposes just another day at the workplace

Tuesday, July 31, 2018|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s viewpoint section

If President Donald Trump’s privately taped conversation with lawyer Michael Cohen reminds you of a criminal offense employer and his consigliere, you’re not alone. Trump’s existing legal representative and mouthpiece, Rudy Giuliani, seemingly concurs.

After CNN first played the tape last Tuesday, Giuliani went on Fox News and downplayed its significance, citing his experience as a mob-busting federal district attorney: “How about 4,000 hours of Mafia people on tape? I know ways to pay attention to them. I understand how to transcribe them. This tape is crystal clear when you listen to (it). I’ve handled much even worse tapes than this.”

Spin-wise, this is the very best they’ve got? That Trump and Cohen do not sound as bad as the Gambino family? Yikes.

The recording, made by Cohen shortly before the 2016 election, is a window onto how Trump works– and, by extension, what sort of person he is. In it, he and his then-lawyer Cohen discuss their machinations to squelch previous Playboy friend Karen McDougal’s story of what she refers to as a 10-month affair with Trump. The president of the United States is revealed as a schemer and a liar. That’s no surprise, I understand, and now we can hear him in action– and there is no other way he can declare the evidence is “fake news.”

Earlier Tuesday, at the annual convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Trump was discussing the economy but sounded nearly as if he knew the Cohen recording was about to come out. He indicated the assembled media, provided his traditional insults, and after that informed the crowd, “Exactly what you’re seeing and exactly what you read is not what’s occurring.”

Echoes of a chilling line in George Orwell’s “1984” were unmistakable: “The Celebration told you to decline the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their last, most vital command.”

And certainly, Trump’s truest followers might search for ways to disbelieve exactly what they hear. They may fall for Giuliani’s effort to make the issue about whether Trump wanted Cohen to pay to quash McDougal’s story with cash or a check– as if that mattered.

What does matter is that, in the recording, Cohen informs Trump he needs to “open a company” to spend for “the transfer of all of that details regarding our pal David”– an apparent referral to David Pecker, chairman of the company that owns the National Enquirer, which in August 2016 paid McDougal $150,000 for unique rights to her account of the affair and after that never ever released a word of it. In the tabloid world, this technique of burying a story is referred to as “catch and eliminate.”

McDougal says her affair with Trump ended in 2007. Why, nine years later, was it suddenly worth 6 figures to keep her story from coming out? The context of the Trump-Cohen discussion makes clear that they were thinking of the upcoming election.

Legal professionals have actually said this implies the $150,000 Pecker’s company paid to McDougal might be an unreported campaign contribution; that Trump might have thus been involved in a conspiracy to violate federal project finance laws; which there may have been fraud in the setting up of a shell business to make an illegal payment.

None of that might be smoking-gun product, however take a broader view. Pay attention to how regular the conversation sounds. In all the computing and lying, there is no tip of anything unusual. For Trump and Cohen, it sounds like simply another day at the office.

The recording is one of numerous, perhaps many, taken by federal representatives throughout raids on Cohen’s workplace, house and hotel room in April. “What kind of a lawyer would tape a client?” Trump angrily demanded in a tweet. Speaking on MSNBC, former federal district attorney Chuck Rosenberg had a response: “Probably, an attorney that does not trust his client.”

Cohen when supposedly said he would take a bullet for Trump. But in recent days, he and his media-savvy attorney, Lanny Davis, have actually made clear that if there is a fall to be taken, Cohen has no objective of taking it alone. This growing estrangement indicates that if Trump attempts to shut Cohen up by pardoning him, the president would not even have the fig leaf of relationship to hide behind. It would be a naked obstruction of justice.

Pay attention to that a person recording then think of the voluminous trove of material gathered in the Cohen raids. For a very long time, only Trump and Cohen understood exactly what was in there. Now federal district attorneys do, too. Soon, it promises, all of us will.

Eugene Robinson is a writer for The Washington Post.

Pressure mounting, former Trump '' fixer ' turns aggressive

Friday, July 27, 2018|3:52 p.m.

WASHINGTON– The hiring of a Washington insider to be a public attack dog. Tantalizing leaks to the media. Puzzling allegations of actions that might fell a president. Talk of more to come.

What is Michael Cohen approximately?

President Donald Trump’s ex-lawyer has actually mostly stayed out of the spotlight in the months since federal representatives robbed his workplace and hotel space and took scores of records about his work for Trump. However today, he has actually taken a greatly more aggressive and public turn, appearing to wage open warfare with the White House while weighing whether to work together with investigators. The moves suggest Cohen is looking for an escape of looming difficulty. However his habits does not rather line up with a clear strategy, legal professionals state. And if his signals are aimed at Trump, they’ve mostly served to irritate the president.

Two days after Cohen’s new lawyer, Lanny Davis, launched a tape of Cohen and Trump speaking about paying for a Playboy model’s silence, the relationship splintered even more on Friday. That sought a CNN report that Cohen was willing to tell special counsel Robert Mueller that Trump knew in advance of a 2016 meeting at Trump Tower in which the Republican prospect’s eldest kid looked for damaging information from a Russian attorney about Hillary Clinton.

Trump on Friday vehemently repeated his rejection that he understood about the meeting, which is at the center of Mueller’s probe, tweeting “NO,” he “did UNKNOWN of the conference with my child, Don jr.”

CNN pointed out anonymous sources stating Cohen was willing to share his information with Mueller, who is investigating possible collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia. Cohen does not have any evidence such as audiotapes verifying his claims, CNN’s sources said.

Cohen’s camp has rejected being the source of the CNN report, the fundamental compound of which The Associated Press separately validated.

The specter of the possibly destructive information, which would run counter to months of rejections and point toward a willingness to collude with a foreign power by Trump himself, once again raised the possibility of exactly what Cohen could provide to district attorneys if he chooses to work together.

Cohen has actually not yet decided to deal with the federal district attorneys from the Southern District of New york city, inning accordance with two individuals acquainted with his thinking but not authorized to talk about personal discussions.

The Justice Department has actually been investigating Cohen for months, raiding his house, office and hotel room in April searching for documents associated with a $130,000 payment the lawyer helped with before the 2016 election to Stormy Daniels, an adult-film starlet who states she made love with Trump in 2006. If Cohen, who focused on making deals and making Trump’s problems disappear, were to cut a deal, he would do so with an eye toward getting rid of or cutting his potential penalty.

Hi legal representative, Lanny Davis, a Democrat as soon as called a fierce protector of President Expense Clinton, would not comment on whether Cohen was fishing for a deal.

“My observation is that it was an evolution that caused him to decide when Donald Trump was president that he needed to inform reality and change his life,” Davis informed the AP. “He hit the reset button on his life and exactly what he had done formerly.”

Those near Cohen explain the legal representative, who has been holed up in a Manhattan hotel after a pipe burst in his house, as bewildered at the fast-moving occasions around him as he tries to look out for his household and deciding about their future. Cohen has likewise been severely harmed by the president’s public anger and is figured out to hit back, inning accordance with two people acquainted with this thinking.

There has actually been some speculation that Cohen might be angling for a pardon from Trump, who has actually begun wielding– and talking about– the governmental power regularly of late. However a person near Cohen minimized the possibility.

Most people in equivalent legal peril would be motivated to stay out of the spotlight and communicate straight with prosecutors, not through journalism, specialists said.

Robert Mintz, a previous federal district attorney now in personal practice, said Cohen “appears to be taking a page out of President Trump’s playbook by having his legal representatives strongly respond in the media to attacks on his reliability and track record.” It’s a “high stakes gambit” that might backfire if he’s angling to end up being a cooperator, Mintz said.

“District attorneys choose to strike cooperation deals silently and in private due to the fact that they want to save the impact of any important statement and information that a working together witness can provide until trial,” he stated.

Additionally, must Cohen choose to work together with investigators, consisting of Mueller, it’s unclear exactly what details he has that they could not gather on their own or have not already learned by themselves.

The Mueller team has been at work for 14 months. Offenders searching for lenient offers through their cooperation generally have better luck if they come through the federal government’s door earlier in an examination.

Additionally, Cohen has actually made no public reference of Trump’s understanding of the Trump Tower conference. If he discussed the vital detail to Home private investigators it was not included in their huge report on the matter.

That disparity was taken upon by Rudy Giuliani, the president’s lawyer. Giuliani, who called Cohen “a truthful, respectable legal representative” as just recently as Might, has made a sport out of bashing Cohen in current days. On Friday he called Cohen “an amazing liar who’s got a remarkable intention to lie now due to the fact that he’s got absolutely nothing to offer.”

Cohen frequently tape-recorded his discussions, and district attorneys are believed to have dozens of them, consisting of conversations with reporters, inning accordance with Davis.

Trump has actually been seething at Cohen because the current tape’s release, raving to confidants that he might not believe he was being betrayed by somebody he dealt with for a decade, inning accordance with an individual familiar with the circumstance but not licensed to go over private conversations.

The president openly aired his complaints with a Friday tweet about Cohen, though he did not name him:

“Sounds to me like someone is attempting to make up stories in order to get himself out of an unassociated jam (Taxi taxis possibly?). He even kept Expense and Crooked Hillary’s legal representative. Gee, I question if they assisted him make the option!”

Cohen states on the tape with Trump that he’s currently spoken about the Daniels-story payment with the Trump Organization’s financing chief, Allen Weisselberg, on “how to set the whole thing up.” The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that Weisselberg, who had intimate knowledge of the president’s finances, was released a subpoena on Thursday.

When inquired about that and other matters, the generally press-friendly Davis on Friday did an abrupt about-face and informed the AP he was now “completely barred from talking to the media.”

Tucker reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Tom Hays and Jake Pearson contributed reporting.

Where I Stand: Is Trump a traitor?

Trump’s conflict of interest

Friday, July 20, 2018|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s viewpoint section

Many professional companies have oversight based on codes of ethics. A typical and vital code associates with the restriction of the look of a dispute of interest.

How is it possible that a president could choose a Supreme Court justice while being associated with a special investigation with close partners put behind bars and under indictment? Where are the safeguards for our precious and hard-fought democracy?

Protest in Las Vegas Saturday over Trump migration policy

Friday, June 29, 2018|6:14 p.m.

Protesters opposed to household separations at the U.S.-Mexico border will require to the streets in Las Vegas on Saturday as part of an across the country demonstration.

Organizers state more than 700 “Families Belong Together” events are expected around the country. They’re requiring that the Trump administration permanently end household separations and immediately reunite children and moms and dads.

The demonstrations follow the arrests in Washington today of almost 600 ladies using white and railing versus the now-abandoned separation policy.

The demonstration in Las Vegas will occur outside the downtown federal court house. It’s set up to start at 10 a.m.

Trump looks out for just himself

Thursday, June 21, 2018|2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s viewpoint section

It is stated that we get the federal government we deserve. If so, what have we done to deserve the unskilled man who holds the office once held by Lincoln, Roosevelt, Eisenhower and so numerous others?

This guy, who had 5 draft deferments for bone spurs, appears to have no doubt in threatening to use our armed force without considering the repercussions. He took an oath to maintain, safeguard and defend the Constitution however demeans and degrades those who exercise their First Change rights of freedom of the press and speech.

He seems to believe he is above the law and has no regard for the guideline of law, at least as it uses to him.

He has actually alienated our allies, strengthened our enemies and threatened nationwide security. He lies or misrepresents truths, blames others for his errors then rejects he ever stated or did these things.

His administration is damaging or destroying the effort done to secure the general public’s health and welfare, all the while using his office to benefit himself and his family.

And Congress sits by silently, choosing not to act as an equal branch of government.This president is not making America terrific, he is ruining our democracy.

Justice Department safeguards Trump'' s company with foreign federal governments

Monday, June 11, 2018|9:23 a.m.

GREENBELT, Md.– President Donald Trump’s hotel business did not break the law by working with other nations, a Justice Department lawyer informed a federal judge Monday.

The state of Maryland and the District Columbia have accused Trump of taking advantage of the presidency and triggering harm to local organisations that compete with his Washington hotel.

Monday’s arguments before U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte look into the compound of the Constitution’s “emoluments clause” and what it indicates. The clause bans federal officials from accepting gain from foreign or state governments without congressional approval.

Last March, Messitte ruled that the plaintiffs can proceed with their lawsuit against Trump’s Washington hotel. However he declined their effort to target Trump Organization residential or commercial properties outside of the immediate location.

Trump administration lawyers say such business activity, consisting of hotel room stays, isn’t really an emolument. Justice Department legal representative Brett Shumate on Monday informed Messitte that no federal official would have the ability to own stock from a foreign business that provides earnings or collects royalties if the argument pressed by Maryland and D.C. is accepted.

But attorney generals of the United States for Maryland and DC have declined the federal government’s position.

“This case has to do with the president of the United States making an affirmative choice to use the federal government to enrich himself,” D.C. Chief Law Officer Karl Racine told The Associated Press last week.

The case in Messitte’s court is one of three emoluments claims versus Trump. Recently, a federal judge in the District heard arguments in a claim pushed by more than 200 Democratic legislators. A 3rd case was declined by a federal judge in New york city and is now on appeal.

Trump thrusts abortion fight into essential midterm elections

Image

Manuel Balce Ceneta/ AP In this Jan. 19, 2018, picture, President Donald Trump speaks to individuals of the yearly March for Life occasion, in the Rose Garden of the White Home in Washington.

Friday, May 18, 2018|3:52 p.m.

WASHINGTON– The Trump administration acted Friday to bar taxpayer-funded family planning centers from referring ladies for abortions, energizing its conservative political base ahead of vital midterm elections while setting the phase for new legal fights.

The Health and Human Services Department sent its proposal to rewrite the guidelines to the White Home, setting in motion a regulatory process that might take months. Little on details, an administration summary of the plan stated it would echo a Reagan-era guideline by banning abortion referrals by federally funded centers and prohibiting them from locating in facilities that likewise provide abortions.

Planned Being a parent, a primary provider of family planning, abortion services and basic preventive take care of women, said the strategy appears created to target the company. “Completion outcome would make it difficult for females to come to Planned Being a parent, who are depending on us every day,” stated executive vice president Dawn Laguens.

However presidential counselor Kellyanne Conway told Fox News that the administration is just recognizing “that abortion is not household planning. This is household preparing loan.”

The policy was derided as a “gag guideline” by abortion rights supporters, a point challenged by the administration, which said therapy about abortion would be OKAY, but not recommendations. It’s most likely to set off lawsuits from challengers, and certain to galvanize activists on both sides of the abortion dispute entering into November’s congressional elections.

The policy “would ensure that taxpayers do not indirectly fund abortions,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a declaration.

Social and religious conservatives have actually stayed steadfastly devoted to President Donald Trump despite concerns like his compensations to attorney Michael Cohen, who paid hush cash to a pornography star alleging an affair, and Trump’s past boasts of sexually aggressive habits. Trump has actually not wavered from advancing the program of the religious right.

Tuesday night, Trump is set up to speak at the Susan B. Anthony List’s “project for life” gala. The group works to elect candidates who wish to lower and ultimately end abortion. It says it spent more than $18 million in the 2016 election cycle to beat Hillary Rodham Clinton and promote a “pro-life Senate.”

The initial Reagan-era household planning guideline disallowed clinics from talking about abortion with females. It never ever entered into effect as written, although the Supreme Court ruled it was a suitable use of executive power. The policy was rescinded under President Costs Clinton, and a brand-new rule took effect requiring “nondirective” therapy to consist of a complete variety of alternatives for women.

The Trump administration said its proposition will roll back the Clinton requirement that abortion be talked about as a choice in addition to prenatal care and adoption.

Known as Title X, the family-planning program serves about 4 million women a year through centers, costing taxpayers about $260 million.

Although abortion is politically divisive, the United States abortion rate has dropped considerably, from about 29 per 1,000 ladies of reproductive age in 1980 to about 15 in 2014. Much better birth control, less unexpected pregnancies and state constraints may have played a role, inning accordance with a current scientific report.

Abortion remains legal, however federal family preparation funds can not be utilized to spend for the procedure. Planned Being a parent centers now receive Title X family preparation grants, however they keep that cash different from funds that pay for abortions.

Abortion challengers state a taxpayer-funded program ought to have no connection to abortion. Physicians’ groups and abortion rights advocates say a ban on therapy ladies trespasses on the doctor-patient relationship.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said the administration action totals up to an “outright invasion” in the doctor-patient relationship and might require medical professionals to leave out “essential, medically accurate info” from counseling sessions with clients.

Planned Parenthood’s Laguens hinted at legal action, stating, “we will not wait while our basic healthcare and rights are stripped away.”

Jessica Marcella of the National Family Preparation & & Reproductive Health Association, which represents clinics, stated requiring physical separation from abortion centers is unwise and would interfere with services for females.

” I can not picture a scenario where public health groups would allow this effort to go undisputed,” Marcella stated.

However abortion challengers said Trump is merely declaring the core objective of the household planning program.

” The brand-new regulations will draw a brilliant line in between abortion centers and household preparation programs, just as … federal law requires and the Supreme Court has actually upheld,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Household Research Study Council, an essential voice for religious conservatives.

Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life of America said, “Abortion is not health care or birth control and many females want natural healthcare options, instead of hormone-induced changes.”

Abortion opponents allege the federal household preparation program in impact cross-subsidizes abortions offered by Planned Parenthood, whose clinics are also major receivers of grants for family planning and fundamental preventive care. Hawkins’ group is distributing a petition to urge lawmakers to support the Trump administration’s proposal.

Abortion challengers say the administration plan is not a “gag rule.” It “will not forbid therapy for clients about abortion … but neither will it consist of the existing mandate that (centers) need to counsel and refer for abortion,” said the administration’s own summary.

Associated Press author David Crary in New york city contributed to this report.

Trump: If FBI spied on my campaign, '' larger than Watergate!''.

Image

< img class=" photo" src= "/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/AP18136734338057_t653.jpg "alt="

Image”/ > Evan Vucci/ AP President Donald Trump speaks throughout a roundtable on migration policy in California in the Cabinet Room of the White House, Wednesday, May 16, 2018, in Washington.

Thursday, May 17, 2018|9:37 a.m.

WASHINGTON– President Donald Trump provided credence Thursday to reports that FBI informants had actually penetrated his presidential campaign, stating that “if so, this is larger than Watergate!”

Trump talked about the anniversary of Robert Mueller’s appointment as unique counsel to head the Justice Department investigation into possible coordination in between Russia and Trump campaign officials, an investigation Trump consistently has called a “witch hunt.”

” Wow, word appears to be coming out that the Obama FBI ‘SPIED ON THE TRUMP PROJECT WITH AN EMBEDDED INFORMANT,'” Trump stated Thursday on Twitter. “Andrew McCarthy says, ‘There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.’ If so, this is larger than Watergate!”

McCarthy, a contributing editor at the National Evaluation, wrote an article released last week headlined “Did the FBI Have a Spy in the Trump Project?”

The New York Times reported individually this week that a minimum of one federal government informant fulfilled numerous times with Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, both former diplomacy consultants on Trump’s Republican politician campaign. The newspaper attributed the info to current and previous FBI officials.

The Watergate scandal in the early 1970s occurred following a burglary by five guys at Democratic Celebration head office at the Watergate building in Washington and subsequent efforts by the administration of President Richard Nixon to conceal its involvement. Nixon, a Republican politician, ultimately resigned from office as a result of the occurring examination.

On the other hand, Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani stated that the president still wishes to affirm in the Russia probe.

Speaking Thursday on “Fox and Buddies,” the former New york city mayor said Trump will just take a seat with Mueller if “we feel there’s a method to reduce this thing.” He included that Trump remains eager to provide his “side of the case.”

Giuliani has actually been prompting Mueller’s team to wrap up the investigation now that the probe has reached the 1 year mark.

Giuliani’s group has actually been weighing whether to allow Trump to sit for an interview with Mueller. He stated the legal group is “quite comfy, in the scenarios of this case, that they wouldn’t be able to subpoena him personally.”

While the Supreme Court has never definitively ruled on the subject, it appears that a sitting president might be required to affirm. In 1974, justices held unanimously that a president might be forced to abide by a subpoena for tapes and documents.

If Trump were subpoenaed and did not wish to affirm, he could always invoke his constitutional right not to affirm against himself and decline to address questions. However that act would present substantial political danger.

Giuliani likewise duplicated that Mueller’s team has actually indicated it would not attempt to prosecute Trump, as he informed The Associated Press on Friday. Justice Department legal viewpoints from 1973 and 2000 have actually suggested that a sitting president is immune from indictment and that criminal charges would weaken the commander in chief’s capability to do the job.

Giuliani told Fox News Channel’s Laura Ingraham on Wednesday that Mueller “has all the facts to make a choice” after 12 months investigating Russian meddling in the election and possible collusion with Trump’s project.

” Mueller should now bring this to a close,” stated Giuliani. “It’s been a year. He’s gotten 1.4 million files, he’s spoken with 28 witnesses. And he has nothing, which is why he wants to bring the president into an interview.”

” It’s about time to say enough. We have actually tortured this president enough,” he included, describing the investigation as being “like a big weight” on the president’s back.

Up until now, the unique counsel’s office has charged 19 people– consisting of 4 Trump campaign advisers– and 3 Russian business. Trump’s former nationwide security advisor, Michael Flynn, and his deputy campaign chairman, Rick Gates, have actually pleaded guilty and are now complying with the probe.

Trump, however, has actually panned it as a “witch hunt” meant to reject his presidency and has firmly insisted that Russia had nothing to do with his winning project.

Giuliani, who is working for the president pro bono, stated Wednesday that the probe “is bad for the American people, and the unique counsel’s office doesn’t appear to have that sort of comprehending that they’re disrupting things that are much bigger than them.”